Literature DB >> 10723737

The phytochrome gene family in tomato and the rapid differential evolution of this family in angiosperms.

R Alba1, P M Kelmenson, M M Cordonnier-Pratt, L H Pratt.   

Abstract

A reexamination of the genome of the tomato (renamed Solanum lycopersicum L.) indicates that it contains five, or at most perhaps six, phytochrome genes (PHY), each encoding a different apoprotein (PHY). Five previously identified tomato PHY genes have been designated PHYA, PHYB1, PHYB2, PHYE, and PHYF. A molecular phylogenetic analysis is consistent with the hypothesis that the angiosperm PHY family is composed of four subfamilies (A, B, C/F, and E). Southern analyses indicate that the tomato genome does not contain both a PHYC and a PHYF. Molecular phylogenetic analyses presented here, which utilize for the first time full-length PHY sequences from two completely characterized angiosperm gene families, indicate that tomato PHYF is probably an ortholog of Arabidopsis PHYC. They also confirm that the angiosperm PHY family is undergoing relatively rapid differential evolution. Assuming PHYF is an ortholog of PHYC, PHY genes in eudicots are evolving (Ka/site) at 1.52-2.79 times the rate calculated as average for other plant nuclear genes. Again assuming PHYF is an ortholog of PHYC, the rate of evolution of the C and E subfamilies is at least 1.33 times the rate of the A and B subfamilies. PHYA and PHYB in eudicots are evolving at least 1.45 times as fast as their counterparts in the Poaceae. PHY functional domains also exhibit different evolutionary rates. The C-terminal region of angiosperm PHY (codons 800-1105) is evolving at least 2.11 times as fast as the photosensory domain (codons 200-500). The central region of a domain essential for phytochrome signal transduction (codons 652-712) is also evolving rapidly. Nonsynonymous substitutions occur in this region at 2.03-3.75 times the average rate for plant nuclear genes. It is not known if this rapid evolution results from selective pressure or from the absence of evolutionary constraint.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10723737     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026316

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  30 in total

1.  Patterns of expression and normalized levels of the five Arabidopsis phytochromes.

Authors:  Robert A Sharrock; Ted Clack
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Structure and expression of maize phytochrome family homeologs.

Authors:  Moira J Sheehan; Phyllis R Farmer; Thomas P Brutnell
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 3.  Evolutionary studies illuminate the structural-functional model of plant phytochromes.

Authors:  Sarah Mathews
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 11.277

4.  Plant photoreceptors: phylogenetic overview.

Authors:  Patricia Lariguet; Christophe Dunand
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2005-09-13       Impact factor: 2.395

5.  Rhizome transition to storage organ is under phytochrome control in lotus (Nelumbo nucifera).

Authors:  Jun-ichiro Masuda; Yukio Ozaki; Hiroshi Okubo
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2007-05-23       Impact factor: 4.116

6.  Dynamic programming procedure for searching optimal models to estimate substitution rates based on the maximum-likelihood method.

Authors:  Chengjun Zhang; Jia Wang; Weibo Xie; Gang Zhou; Manyuan Long; Qifa Zhang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Biliverdin reductase-induced phytochrome chromophore deficiency in transgenic tobacco.

Authors:  B L Montgomery; K A Franklin; M J Terry; B Thomas; S D Jackson; M W Crepeau; J C Lagarias
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 8.340

8.  Distinct and cooperative functions of phytochromes A, B, and C in the control of deetiolation and flowering in rice.

Authors:  Makoto Takano; Noritoshi Inagaki; Xianzhi Xie; Natsu Yuzurihara; Fukiko Hihara; Toru Ishizuka; Masahiro Yano; Minoru Nishimura; Akio Miyao; Hirohiko Hirochika; Tomoko Shinomura
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2005-11-08       Impact factor: 11.277

9.  Amino acid polymorphisms in Arabidopsis phytochrome B cause differential responses to light.

Authors:  Daniele L Filiault; Carolyn A Wessinger; Jose R Dinneny; Jason Lutes; Justin O Borevitz; Detlef Weigel; Joanne Chory; Julin N Maloof
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-02-14       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  High pigment1 mutation negatively regulates phototropic signal transduction in tomato seedlings.

Authors:  Ankanagari Srinivas; Rajendra K Behera; Takatoshi Kagawa; Masamitsu Wada; Rameshwar Sharma
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2004-01-22       Impact factor: 8.340

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.