Literature DB >> 10721770

Cost analyses of adjunct colony stimulating factors for acute leukemia: can they improve clinical decision making.

C L Bennett1, T J Stinson, J H Laver, M R Bishop, J E Godwin, M S Tallman.   

Abstract

Colony stimulating factors reduce the duration of neutropenia following intensive chemotherapy in a variety of settings, but the advantages in the management of leukemia are inconclusive. The variations in clinical results and the high costs of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) have led to confusion over appropriate use for leukemia patients. In this paper, we reviewed published information on costs and cost-effectiveness of growth factors for childhood and adult leukemia patients. Medline and Healthstar databases were searched for original research articles that contain cost or cost-effectiveness analyses of G-CSF (filgrastim) and GM-SCF (sargramostim) in oncology cooperative group trials. Published manuscripts and abstracts presented at national or international oncology conferences were included. The cost of adjunct treatment was evaluated in two studies of pediatric ALL, one study of adult AML, and two studies of AML in older adults (>55 years). The use of G-CSF for children with ALL was associated with reductions in days to ANC recovery, fewer documented infections, a shorter duration of hospitalization, and small (but not significant) additional costs. In adult AML patients, benefits included a shortening of the duration of neutropenia and hospital stays, a lower incidence of infection and febrile episodes, less use of antibiotics, and cost savings of $2,230 and $2,310 in two studies and an increase if $120 in the third study. This summary suggests that economic analyses can provide useful information to assist clinical decision-making. For pediatric ALL patients, this information indicates that G-CSF use is unlikely to have significant cost implications, and its use should be based on clinical considerations. In studies of adult and older adult AML patients, both GM-CSF and G-CSF have clinical benefits and can be expected to lead to a decrease in overall costs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10721770     DOI: 10.3109/10428190009057629

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma        ISSN: 1026-8022


  6 in total

Review 1.  The role of myelopoietic growth factors in managing cancer in the elderly.

Authors:  Lodovico Balducci; Ignazio Carreca
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  Colony-stimulating factors for the management of neutropenia in cancer patients.

Authors:  David C Dale
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  Cost analyses of adjunct colony stimulating factors for older patients with acute myeloid leukaemia : can they improve clinical decision making?

Authors:  Charles L Bennett; Glen T Schumock
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 4.  Granulopoiesis-stimulating factors to prevent adverse effects in the treatment of malignant lymphoma.

Authors:  Julia Bohlius; Christine Herbst; Marcel Reiser; Guido Schwarzer; Andreas Engert
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-10-08

Review 5.  Economic burden of haematological adverse effects in cancer patients: a systematic review.

Authors:  S Y Liou; J M Stephens; K T Carpiuc; W Feng; M F Botteman; J W Hay
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.859

6.  Canadian supportive care recommendations for the management of neutropenia in patients with cancer.

Authors:  C T Kouroukis; S Chia; S Verma; D Robson; C Desbiens; C Cripps; J Mikhael
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.677

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.