Literature DB >> 10721165

[Determining priorities in the development of medical guidelines. 1: Criteria, procedures and actors: a methodological review of international experiences].

A Helou1, M Perleth, F W Schwartz.   

Abstract

Setting priorities for the development of clinical practice guidelines has--similar to other decision-making procedures in health care--as much a political as a scientific component. Prioritizing guidelines aims to allocate resources to those health problems likely to maximize medical, social and economic outcomes associated with the use of these guidelines. This is a review and critical appraisal of international initiatives of systematically setting priorities for the development of clinical practice guidelines. Priority-setting criteria, both quantitative and qualitative methods as well as participation by relevant stakeholders will be discussed. This review provides possible decision-makers with an information basis which may assist in the development of concepts for setting priorities in a given context.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10721165

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich        ISSN: 1431-7621


  2 in total

1.  Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 2. Priority setting.

Authors:  Andrew D Oxman; Holger J Schünemann; Atle Fretheim
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2006-11-29

Review 2.  The systematic guideline review: method, rationale, and test on chronic heart failure.

Authors:  Christiane Muth; Jochen Gensichen; Martin Beyer; Allen Hutchinson; Ferdinand M Gerlach
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 2.655

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.