Literature DB >> 10721017

The impact of clean indoor-air laws and cigarette smuggling on demand for cigarettes: an empirical model.

A A Yurekli1, P Zhang.   

Abstract

This study examines the impact of clean indoor-air laws and smuggling activities on states' per capita cigarette consumption and revenues by using a static demand model. The analysis was based on data for 50 states and the District of Columbia (DC) of the United Sates over the period 1970-1995. The estimated price elasticities of demand for cigarettes ranged from -0.48 to -0.62, indicating that a 10% increase in price would reduce consumption per capita by 4.8% to 6.2%. Anti-smoking laws had a significant negative impact on per capita consumption. In 1995, consumption was reduced by 4.7 packs per capita among states with anti-smoking laws, or 1.1 billion fewer packs of cigarettes consumed. Both short-distance smuggling between neighbouring states and long-distance smuggling from Kentucky, North Carolina and Virginia existed and were significant. Smuggling activities from military bases and Indian reservations, however, were not significant. On average, 6% of states' tax revenues were lost due to smuggling activities in 1995. Results also showed that short-distance smuggling was less important than long-distance smuggling as a source of the revenue loss. Copyright 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10721017     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1050(200003)9:2<159::aid-hec499>3.0.co;2-t

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Econ        ISSN: 1057-9230            Impact factor:   3.046


  20 in total

Review 1.  The economics of global tobacco control.

Authors:  P Jha; F J Chaloupka
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-08-05

2.  Effect of clean indoor air laws on smokers: the clean air module of the SimSmoke computer simulation model.

Authors:  D T Levy; K Friend; E Polishchuk
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 7.552

3.  Was there significant tax evasion after the 1999 50 cent per pack cigarette tax increase in California?

Authors:  S Emery; M M White; E A Gilpin; J P Pierce
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 4.  Effect of smoke-free workplaces on smoking behaviour: systematic review.

Authors:  Caroline M Fichtenberg; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-07-27

5.  Does smoke cross the border? Cigarette tax avoidance in France.

Authors:  Christian Ben Lakhdar; Nicolas Gérard Vaillant; François-Charles Wolff
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2015-11-13

6.  Higher cigarette prices influence cigarette purchase patterns.

Authors:  A Hyland; J E Bauer; Q Li; S M Abrams; C Higbee; L Peppone; K M Cummings
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 7.552

7.  Price and cigarette consumption in Europe.

Authors:  S Gallus; A Schiaffino; C La Vecchia; J Townsend; E Fernandez
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 7.552

8.  Cigarette purchase patterns in four countries and the relationship with cessation: findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey.

Authors:  A Hyland; F L Laux; C Higbee; G Hastings; H Ross; F J Chaloupka; G T Fong; K M Cummings
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 7.552

9.  Discrete choice experiment of smoking cessation behaviour in Japan.

Authors:  Rei Goto; Shuzo Nishimura; Takanori Ida
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 7.552

10.  Economic and political influence on tobacco tax rates: a nationwide analysis of 31 years of state data.

Authors:  Shelley D Golden; Kurt M Ribisl; Krista M Perreira
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 9.308

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.