Literature DB >> 10720834

Randomized trial of oral sodium phosphate compared with oral sodium picosulphate (Picolax) for elective colorectal surgery and colonoscopy.

K Yoshioka1, A B Connolly, O A Ogunbiyi, H Hasegawa, D G Morton, M R Keighley.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sodium picosulphate (Picolax) is considered by most British surgeons as standard preparation for colonoscopy and elective surgery. Oral sodium phosphate may be better tolerated and more efficient as bowel preparation.
METHODS: A randomized trial was performed to compare oral sodium phosphate (n = 76) with Picolax (n = 77) as bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery. A parallel study randomized colonoscopy patients to sodium phosphate (n = 51) or Picolax (n = 52). Patient acceptability was measured for seven symptoms with a linear analogue score. Quality of preparation was graded by the surgeon and faecal residue was measured in resection specimens. During colonoscopy, bowel preparation has graded 0-24 using an endoscopic score.
RESULTS: Abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, embarrassment, fear and fatigue did not differ significantly between the groups. Surgeons grade of quality was judged poor or awful in 5 of 76 in the sodium phosphate group (9%) compared with 13 of 73 in the Picolax group (18%, p = 0.084). Mean faecal residue in the resection specimen was 0.1 g/cm after sodium phosphate compared with 0.45 g/cm after Picolax (p < 0.01). The endoscopic score was significantly lower using sodium phosphate (2.0 +/- 2.2) than picolax (3.1 +/- 2.9; p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that oral sodium phosphate is well tolerated and superior to Picolax in elective colorectal surgery and colonoscopy. Copyright 2000 S. Karger AG, Basel

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10720834     DOI: 10.1159/000018802

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Surg        ISSN: 0253-4886            Impact factor:   2.588


  15 in total

Review 1.  Commonly used preparations for colonoscopy: efficacy, tolerability, and safety--a Canadian Association of Gastroenterology position paper.

Authors:  Alan Barkun; Naoki Chiba; Robert Enns; Margaret Marcon; Susan Natsheh; Co Pham; Dan Sadowski; Stephen Vanner
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.522

2.  A consensus document on bowel preparation before colonoscopy: prepared by a task force from the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS), the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE), and the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES).

Authors:  Steven D Wexner; David E Beck; Todd H Baron; Robert D Fanelli; Neil Hyman; Bo Shen; Kevin E Wasco
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-06-08       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Oral colorectal cleansing preparations in adults.

Authors:  Sherief Shawki; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  Mechanism of action and toxicities of purgatives used for colonoscopy preparation.

Authors:  Margaret Adamcewicz; Dilip Bearelly; Gail Porat; Frank K Friedenberg
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.481

Review 5.  A review of current issues underlying colon cleansing before colonoscopy.

Authors:  Lawrence C Hookey; Stephen Vanner
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.522

6.  A randomized controlled trial of four precolonoscopy bowel cleansing regimens.

Authors:  Dina Kao; Eoin Lalor; Gurpal Sandha; Richard N Fedorak; Bloeme van der Knoop; Stieneke Doornweerd; Harmke van Kooten; Eline Schreuders; William Midodzi; Sander Veldhuyzen van Zanten
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.522

7.  Colon and rectal surgery without mechanical bowel preparation: a randomized prospective trial.

Authors:  Oded Zmora; Ahmad Mahajna; Barak Bar-Zakai; Danny Rosin; Dan Hershko; Moshe Shabtai; Michael M Krausz; Amram Ayalon
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Colon and rectal surgery for cancer without mechanical bowel preparation: one-center randomized prospective trial.

Authors:  Stefano Scabini; Edoardo Rimini; Emanuele Romairone; Renato Scordamaglia; Giampiero Damiani; Davide Pertile; Valter Ferrando
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-04-30       Impact factor: 2.754

9.  A prospective study of colonoscopy practice in the UK today: are we adequately prepared for national colorectal cancer screening tomorrow?

Authors:  C J A Bowles; R Leicester; C Romaya; E Swarbrick; C B Williams; O Epstein
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  A multicentre, observational study of sodium picosulfate and magnesium citrate as a precolonoscopy bowel preparation.

Authors:  Jonthan Love; Edmond-Jean Bernard; Alan Cockeram; Lawrence Cohen; Martin Fishman; James Gray; David Morgan
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.522

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.