Literature DB >> 10720686

The response of providers to capitation payment: a case-study from Thailand.

A Mills1, S Bennett, P Siriwanarangsun, V Tangcharoensathien.   

Abstract

Those designing payment systems for health care in low and middle income countries are increasingly looking to capitation payment, in order to avoid the cost inflation experienced with fee-for-service payment. However, there is virtually no documentation of the experience of introducing capitation payment, or of its effects. This paper draws on several research studies to explore responses by health care providers at both the market and facility level to the introduction of capitation payment, in the context of a new compulsory insurance scheme for workers in Thailand. The paper ends by identifying lessons for both Thailand itself and for other countries.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10720686     DOI: 10.1016/s0168-8510(00)00059-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Policy        ISSN: 0168-8510            Impact factor:   2.980


  15 in total

1.  Learning from Thailand's health reforms.

Authors:  Adrian Towse; Anne Mills; Viroj Tangcharoensathien
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-01-10

2.  Efficiency of Thai provincial public hospitals during the introduction of universal health coverage using capitation.

Authors:  Rajitkanok A Puenpatom; Robert Rosenman
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2008-12

3.  Reflections on the development of health economics in low- and middle-income countries.

Authors:  Anne Mills
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 4.  A narrative synthesis of illustrative evidence on effects of capitation payment for primary care: lessons for Ghana and other low/middle-income countries.

Authors:  Francis-Xavier Andoh-Adjei; Ernst Spaan; Felix A Asante; Sylvester A Mensah; Koos van der Velden
Journal:  Ghana Med J       Date:  2016-12

5.  The effect of the capitation policy withdrawal on maternal health service provision in Ashanti Region, Ghana: an interrupted time series analysis.

Authors:  John Kanyiri Yambah; Kofi Akohene Mensah; Naasegnibe Kuunibe; Kindness Laar; Roger Ayimbillah Atinga; Millicent Ofori Boateng; Daniel Opoku; Wilm Quentin
Journal:  Glob Health Res Policy       Date:  2022-10-21

Review 6.  The Lancet Global Health Commission on financing primary health care: putting people at the centre.

Authors:  Kara Hanson; Nouria Brikci; Darius Erlangga; Abebe Alebachew; Manuela De Allegri; Dina Balabanova; Mark Blecher; Cheryl Cashin; Alexo Esperato; David Hipgrave; Ina Kalisa; Christoph Kurowski; Qingyue Meng; David Morgan; Gemini Mtei; Ellen Nolte; Chima Onoka; Timothy Powell-Jackson; Martin Roland; Rajeev Sadanandan; Karin Stenberg; Jeanette Vega Morales; Hong Wang; Haja Wurie
Journal:  Lancet Glob Health       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 38.927

7.  Health worker preferences for community-based health insurance payment mechanisms: a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Paul Jacob Robyn; Till Bärnighausen; Aurélia Souares; Germain Savadogo; Brice Bicaba; Ali Sié; Rainer Sauerborn
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 8.  Provider payment in community-based health insurance schemes in developing countries: a systematic review.

Authors:  Paul Jacob Robyn; Rainer Sauerborn; Till Bärnighausen
Journal:  Health Policy Plan       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 3.344

9.  Promoting universal financial protection: how the Thai universal coverage scheme was designed to ensure equity.

Authors:  Viroj Tangcharoensathien; Siriwan Pitayarangsarit; Walaiporn Patcharanarumol; Phusit Prakongsai; Hathaichanok Sumalee; Jiraboon Tosanguan; Anne Mills
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2013-08-06

10.  Performance evaluation of a health insurance in Nigeria using optimal resource use: health care providers perspectives.

Authors:  Shafiu Mohammed; Aurélia Souares; Justo Lorenzo Bermejo; Rainer Sauerborn; Hengjin Dong
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.