Literature DB >> 10720117

Reliance on serum endomysial antibody testing underestimates the true prevalence of coeliac disease by one fifth.

W Dickey1, D F Hughes, S A McMillan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although IgA endomysial antibody (EmA) is currently the serologic test of choice in selecting suspected coeliac patients for duodenal biopsies, false-negative cases have been reported and may be more common than previous studies suggest. We assessed the sensitivity of EmA for patients with biopsy-confirmed villous atrophy (VA).
METHODS: We studied 89 patients without IgA deficiency for whom biopsy had not been primarily prompted by a positive EmA result. VA was graded as partial, subtotal, or total (PVA, STVA, TVA). Serum EmA was assayed with indirect immunofluorescence.
RESULTS: The sensitivity of EmA for VA was 78% (69 of 89) and was similar for PVA (79%) and ST/TVA (77%). Only 4 of the 20 EmA-negative patients had increased serum IgA-class antigliadin antibody levels as measured with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. All seronegative patients who complied with dietary gluten exclusion responded clinically, with histologic improvement after 12 months in 8 (67%) of 12 patients who had follow-up biopsies.
CONCLUSIONS: EmA-negative coeliac disease is common. Reliance on EmA testing to select patients for biopsy will result in significant underdiagnosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10720117     DOI: 10.1080/003655200750024362

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0036-5521            Impact factor:   2.423


  21 in total

1.  Invasive or non-invasive methods for the diagnosis of subclinical coeliac disease?

Authors:  A Tursi
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Seronegative celiac disease: increased prevalence with lesser degrees of villous atrophy.

Authors:  Julian A Abrams; Beverly Diamond; Heidrun Rotterdam; Peter H R Green
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Diagnosis of coeliac disease.

Authors:  R G Peter Watson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-04-02

4.  Screening for celiac disease in family members: is follow-up testing necessary?

Authors:  David Goldberg; Debbie Kryszak; Alessio Fasano; Peter H R Green
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2007-02-16       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Histologic evidence for mild lesions in coeliac disease: the challenge is open.

Authors:  Paola Ilaria Bianchi; Federico Biagi; Gino Roberto Corazza
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2011-05-15       Impact factor: 3.397

6.  Endomysial antibody-negative coeliac disease: clinical characteristics and intestinal autoantibody deposits.

Authors:  T T Salmi; P Collin; I R Korponay-Szabó; K Laurila; J Partanen; H Huhtala; R Király; L Lorand; T Reunala; M Mäki; K Kaukinen
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Transthyretin values correlate with mucosal recovery in patients with coeliac disease taking a gluten free diet.

Authors:  S A McMillan; W Dickey; J P Douglas; D F Hughes
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Screening of tissue transglutaminase antibody in healthy blood donors for celiac disease screening in the Turkish population.

Authors:  Gonca Tatar; Rengin Elsurer; Halis Simsek; Yasemin H Balaban; Gulsen Hascelik; Osman I Ozcebe; Yahya Buyukasik; Cenk Sokmensuer
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  Prevalence of celiac disease in Germany: a prospective follow-up study.

Authors:  Wolfgang Kratzer; Monika Kibele; Atilla Akinli; Marc Porzner; Bernhard O Boehm; Wolfgang Koenig; Suemeyra Oeztuerk; Richard A Mason; Ren Mao; Mark H Haenle
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Tetramer-visualized gluten-specific CD4+ T cells in blood as a potential diagnostic marker for coeliac disease without oral gluten challenge.

Authors:  Asbjørn Christophersen; Melinda Ráki; Elin Bergseng; Knut Ea Lundin; Jørgen Jahnsen; Ludvig M Sollid; Shuo-Wang Qiao
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 4.623

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.