Literature DB >> 10719964

How much labor is in a labor epidural? Manpower cost and reimbursement for an obstetric analgesia service in a teaching institution.

E D Bell1, D H Penning, E F Cousineau, W D White, A J Hartle, W C Gilbert, D A Lubarsky.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Some anesthesiologists avoid provision of obstetric analgesia services (OAS) because of low reimbursement rates for the work involved. This study defines the manpower costs of operating an OAS in a tertiary referral center and examines reimbursement for this cost.
METHODS: The time spent providing OAS in a total of 55 parturients was studied prospectively using a modification of classic time and motion studies.
RESULTS: Mean duration of OAS in our population was 412 +/- 313 min. Mean bedside anesthesia staff time was 90 +/- 40 min, and mean number of visits to each patient's bedside was 6.3 +/- 2.0 visits. Assuming staffing on demand for service (intermittent staffing), a minimum of 2.5 full-time equivalent (FTE) attending anesthesiologists was required to meet demand. With intermittent staffing, labor cost was $325 per patient. Actual practice at Duke University Medical Center is around-the-clock (dedicated) staffing, which requires 4.4 FTEs at a cost of $728 per patient. Neither average indemnity reimbursement ($299) nor Medicaid reimbursement ($204) covered the cost per OAS patient. Breaking even is possible under indemnity reimbursement because operating room reimbursement subsidizes OAS costs. Breaking even cannot occur with Medicaid reimbursement under any circumstances.
CONCLUSIONS: Obstetric analgesia services requires a minimum of 2.5 FTE attending anesthesiologists at Duke University Medical Center. With the current payer mix, positive-margin operating room activities associated with the obstetric service are not sufficient to compensate for the losses incurred by an OAS. Around-the-clock dedicated obstetric staffing (4.4 FTEs) cannot operate profitably under any reasonable circumstances at our institution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10719964     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200003000-00029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  3 in total

Review 1.  Economic considerations related to providing adequate pain relief for women in labour: comparison of epidural and intravenous analgesia.

Authors:  Cecil Huang; Alex Macario
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  The impact of antenatal massage practice on intrapartum massage application and their associations with the use of analgesics during labour : Sub-analysis of a randomised control trial.

Authors:  Chit Ying Lai; Margaret Kit Wah Wong; Wing Hung Tong; Kam Yan Lau; Suk Yin Chu; Agnes Mei Lee Tam; Lai Ling Hui; Terence T H Lao; Tak Yeung Leung
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 3.105

3.  Comparison of the obstetric anesthesia activity index with total delivery numbers as a single denominator of workload demand in Israeli maternity units.

Authors:  Yehuda Ginosar; Alex Ioscovich; Charles Weissman; Ronit Calderon-Margalit; Carolyn F Weiniger
Journal:  Isr J Health Policy Res       Date:  2012-12-14
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.