Literature DB >> 10719331

Genetic amniocentesis in women 20-34 years old: associated risks.

A Antsaklis1, N Papantoniou, A Xygakis, S Mesogitis, E Tzortzis, S Michalas.   

Abstract

The aim of this retrospective controlled study is to evaluate the impact of predisposing factors on amniocentesis-related fetal loss. It comprises 3910 consecutive cases of women, aged 20-34 years, who had genetic amniocentesis during the years 1992-97 (study group). The control group comprised 5324 women under 35, at low risk for Down syndrome, during the same period. The fetal losses in both groups were analysed, in respect of: (a) maternal historical conditions; and/or (b) bleeding during current pregnancy. The leading indication for amniocentesis in women 20-34 years was maternal anxiety, mainly for marginal age (33-34 years), which accounted for a remarkable 34.4% of the study group. Total fetal loss rate up to the 28th week was 2.1% in the study group versus 1. 5% in controls. A history of previous spontaneous or induced abortions, as well as bleeding during the current pregnancy, was associated with a substantial rise of fetal loss in both groups. In cases with no predisposing factors, the added fetal loss rate was 0.03%. Previous abortions and bleeding during the current pregnancy are associated with the most fetal losses after amniocentesis. In the absence of these, the added fetal loss rate (0.03%) is non-significant. Copyright 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10719331

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  6 in total

1.  Prenatal diagnosis for paediatricians.

Authors:  Anne Summers
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.253

2.  Perceptions of prenatal testing for birth defects among rural Latinas.

Authors:  Courtney Griffiths; Miriam Kuppermann
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2007-10-05

3.  Does bleeding affect fetal Doppler parameters during genetic amniocentesis?

Authors:  Cantekin Iskender; Ebru Tarım; Tayfun Cok; Hakan Kalaycı; Ayşe Parlakgümüş; Cem Yalçınkaya
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2014-06-01

4.  Conventional 22- and 20-gauge needle for second trimester amniocentesis: A comparison of short term outcomes.

Authors:  Seyit Ali Köse; Mehmet Özgür Akkurt; And Yavuz; Serenat Eriş; Esra Nur Tola; Mehmet Okan Özkaya; Mekin Sezik
Journal:  Turk J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-03-10

5.  Obstetrical Outcomes of Amniocentesis or Chorionic Villus Sampling in Dichorionic Twin Pregnancies.

Authors:  Mi Sun Kim; Myoung Jin Moon; Sukho Kang; Sang Hee Jung; Sung Woon Chang; Hyo Jin Ki; Bohye Kim; Eunhee Ahn
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 2.153

6.  Comparison of complications of chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis.

Authors:  Nahid Shahbazian; Mojgan Barati; Parvin Arian; Najmie Saadati
Journal:  Int J Fertil Steril       Date:  2012-03-20
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.