Literature DB >> 10719311

Dose-response in double-blind, placebo-controlled oral food challenges in children with atopic dermatitis.

S H Sicherer1, E H Morrow, H A Sampson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Double-blind, placebo-controlled oral food challenges (DBPCFCs) are considered the "gold standard" for diagnosing food hypersensitivity, but the dose that elicits positive challenges, or determinants that may predict dose-response relationships, have not been reported.
OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to determine the quantity of food that elicits reactions during DBPCFCs and to evaluate parameters that may predict the provocative dose and severity of reaction.
METHODS: We reviewed challenge data for all positive challenges to 6 common allergenic foods in children with atopic dermatitis evaluated for food allergy over a 13-year period. Challenge food was generally administered in 6 doses at 10- to 15-minute intervals beginning with 400 to 500 mg and completing with a total of 8 to 10 g of food. An open feeding of a larger portion followed negative challenges. At the physician's discretion, a lower starting dose was occasionally used (100 mg, 250 mg). Food-specific IgE antibody concentrations (radioallergosorbent test [RAST]) were determined on stored sera of 20% of the challenges selected randomly and 99.6% had prick skin tests (PSTs) performed to the challenged food.
RESULTS: A total of 196 children (45% male; median age 5 y 9 mo; atopic dermatitis 98%, asthma 62%) had 513 positive challenges distributed as follows: egg 267, milk 117, soy 53, wheat 40, peanut 24, fish 12. The percentage of children reacting at the first dose (500 mg or less) was as follows: egg 49%, milk 55%, soy 28%, wheat 25%, peanut 26%, and fish 17%. Twenty-six milk challenges and 22 egg challenges were positive at a first dose of 250 mg; 3 milk challenges and 7 egg challenges were positive at a first dose of 100 mg. Eleven percent of the reactions that occurred on the first dose were severe. The percentage reacting after the final dose of the DBPCFC (or during open challenge) were egg 11%, milk 12%, soy 19%, wheat 12.5%, peanut 8.7%, and fish 25%. There was not a strong correlation between PST absolute wheal size or score (adjusted for histamine controls) and dose at reaction or severity of reaction (R(s) range -0.22 to 0.39 for particular foods). Serum concentration of food-specific IgE did not correlate well with the dose causing a reaction or with severity (R(s) range -0.40 to 0.55 for particular foods).
CONCLUSIONS: This food-allergic population may react to as little as 100 mg of food, possibly less, and the dose causing a reaction and the severity of reaction is not predicted by PST or RAST. Lower doses (100 mg or less) should be investigated for their appropriateness in initiating DBPCFCs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10719311     DOI: 10.1067/mai.2000.104941

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol        ISSN: 0091-6749            Impact factor:   10.793


  40 in total

1.  Food-induced anaphylaxis.

Authors:  Antonella Cianferoni; Antonella Muraro
Journal:  Immunol Allergy Clin North Am       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 3.479

2.  Structure and stability of 2S albumin-type peanut allergens: implications for the severity of peanut allergic reactions.

Authors:  Katrin Lehmann; Kristian Schweimer; Gerald Reese; Stefanie Randow; Martin Suhr; Wolf-Meinhard Becker; Stefan Vieths; Paul Rösch
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2006-05-01       Impact factor: 3.857

Review 3.  Optimizing the diagnosis of food allergy.

Authors:  Jacob D Kattan; Scott H Sicherer
Journal:  Immunol Allergy Clin North Am       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 3.479

4.  A bioinformatics approach to identify patients with symptomatic peanut allergy using peptide microarray immunoassay.

Authors:  Jing Lin; Francesca M Bruni; Zhiyan Fu; Jennifer Maloney; Ludmilla Bardina; Attilio L Boner; Gustavo Gimenez; Hugh A Sampson
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 10.793

Review 5.  NIAID-sponsored 2010 guidelines for managing food allergy: applications in the pediatric population.

Authors:  A Wesley Burks; Stacie M Jones; Joshua A Boyce; Scott H Sicherer; Robert A Wood; Amal Assa'ad; Hugh A Sampson
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  Epinephrine treatment is infrequent and biphasic reactions are rare in food-induced reactions during oral food challenges in children.

Authors:  Kirsi M Järvinen; Sujitha Amalanayagam; Wayne G Shreffler; Sally Noone; Scott H Sicherer; Hugh A Sampson; Anna Nowak-Wegrzyn
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 10.793

Review 7.  Food-Induced Anaphylaxis: an Update.

Authors:  Christopher P Parrish; Heidi Kim
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 4.806

8.  Hypogammaglobulinaemia secondary to cow-milk allergy in children under 2 years of age.

Authors:  Liliana Bezrodnik; Andrea C Gómez Raccio; Laura M Canil; Maria Amanda Rey; Patricia C Carabajal; Carlos A Fossati; Guillermo H Docena
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  2007-05-11       Impact factor: 7.397

9.  The Key Events Dose-Response Framework: a foundation for examining variability in elicitation thresholds for food allergens.

Authors:  Steve L Taylor; Steven M Gendel; Geert F Houben; Elizabeth Julien
Journal:  Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 11.176

10.  Diagnostic evaluation of food-related allergic diseases.

Authors:  John Eckman; Sarbjit S Saini; Robert G Hamilton
Journal:  Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol       Date:  2009-10-22       Impact factor: 3.406

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.