P Bower1, R West, A Tylee, M Hann. 1. National Primary Care Research and Development Centre, University of Manchester, Williamson Building, Fifth Floor, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK. peter.bower@man.ac.uk
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Patients' interpretation of ambiguous physical symptoms may influence illness presentation in primary care. The present study sought to investigate the influence of symptom attribution style on the recognition of psychiatric morbidity by general practitioners (GPs). METHODS: Patients consulting GPs completed assessments of attribution style and General Health Questionnaires (GHQs), while GPs provided independent ratings of psychiatric distress. Analysis examined the relationship between patient demographic variables, attribution style (using the Symptom Interpretation Questionnaire [SIQ]), and GP and GHQ assessments of patients' mental health. RESULTS: The results indicate that severity of disorder and patient age were reliable predictors of recognition: normalizing and psychological attributions were additional predictors in some analyses, but their effects were inconsistent. CONCLUSIONS: The results provide some support for the role of symptom attribution in the recognition of psychiatric morbidity, but suggest that the predictive value of such attributions may be relatively modest. The SIQ may not be the optimum instrument for the measurement of attributions.
OBJECTIVE:Patients' interpretation of ambiguous physical symptoms may influence illness presentation in primary care. The present study sought to investigate the influence of symptom attribution style on the recognition of psychiatric morbidity by general practitioners (GPs). METHODS:Patients consulting GPs completed assessments of attribution style and General Health Questionnaires (GHQs), while GPs provided independent ratings of psychiatric distress. Analysis examined the relationship between patient demographic variables, attribution style (using the Symptom Interpretation Questionnaire [SIQ]), and GP and GHQ assessments of patients' mental health. RESULTS: The results indicate that severity of disorder and patient age were reliable predictors of recognition: normalizing and psychological attributions were additional predictors in some analyses, but their effects were inconsistent. CONCLUSIONS: The results provide some support for the role of symptom attribution in the recognition of psychiatric morbidity, but suggest that the predictive value of such attributions may be relatively modest. The SIQ may not be the optimum instrument for the measurement of attributions.