AIMS: To determine the relationship between risedronate pharmacokinetics and renal function. METHODS: Risedronate was administered to adult men and women (n=21) with various degrees of renal function (creatinine clearance 15-126 ml min-1 ) as a single oral dose of 30 mg. Serum samples were obtained for 72 h after dosing, and urine samples were collected for 72 h after dosing and then periodically for 6 weeks. Risedronate concentrations were determined using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Risedronate serum concentration-time and urinary excretion rate-time profiles were analysed simultaneously using nonlinear regression. RESULTS: Renal clearance and volume of distribution were linearly related to creatinine clearance (r2=0.854, P<0.001; and r2=0.317, P<0.01, respectively). Decreases in predicted renal clearance and volume of distribution of 82 and 69%, respectively, were observed when creatinine clearance decreased from 120 to 20 ml min-1. A 64% decrease in predicted oral clearance was observed when creatinine clearance decreased from 120 to 20 ml min-1 (P=0.064). Iohexol clearance, a predictor of renal function, produced similar results to those observed with creatinine clearance. Risedronate was well tolerated by the study population. CONCLUSIONS: Risedronate renal clearance was significantly related to a decrease in renal function. There was a consistent reduction in oral clearance with a decrease in creatinine clearance. However, based on the regression analysis, generally no dosage adjustment appears to be necessary for most patients with mild or moderate renal impairment (creatinine clearance >20 ml min-1 ).
AIMS: To determine the relationship between risedronate pharmacokinetics and renal function. METHODS:Risedronate was administered to adult men and women (n=21) with various degrees of renal function (creatinine clearance 15-126 ml min-1 ) as a single oral dose of 30 mg. Serum samples were obtained for 72 h after dosing, and urine samples were collected for 72 h after dosing and then periodically for 6 weeks. Risedronate concentrations were determined using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Risedronate serum concentration-time and urinary excretion rate-time profiles were analysed simultaneously using nonlinear regression. RESULTS: Renal clearance and volume of distribution were linearly related to creatinine clearance (r2=0.854, P<0.001; and r2=0.317, P<0.01, respectively). Decreases in predicted renal clearance and volume of distribution of 82 and 69%, respectively, were observed when creatinine clearance decreased from 120 to 20 ml min-1. A 64% decrease in predicted oral clearance was observed when creatinine clearance decreased from 120 to 20 ml min-1 (P=0.064). Iohexol clearance, a predictor of renal function, produced similar results to those observed with creatinine clearance. Risedronate was well tolerated by the study population. CONCLUSIONS:Risedronate renal clearance was significantly related to a decrease in renal function. There was a consistent reduction in oral clearance with a decrease in creatinine clearance. However, based on the regression analysis, generally no dosage adjustment appears to be necessary for most patients with mild or moderate renal impairment (creatinine clearance >20 ml min-1 ).
Authors: J R Berenson; L Rosen; R Vescio; H S Lau; M Woo; A Sioufi; M O Kowalski; R D Knight; J J Seaman Journal: J Clin Pharmacol Date: 1997-04 Impact factor: 3.126
Authors: D Y Mitchell; R A Eusebio; L E Dunlap; K A Pallone; J D Nesbitt; D A Russell; M E Clay; P J Bekker Journal: Pharm Res Date: 1998-02 Impact factor: 4.200
Authors: H Saha; P Castren-Kortekangas; S Ojanen; A Juhakoski; J Tuominen; O Tokola; A Pasternack Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 1994-12 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: B J Gertz; S D Holland; W F Kline; B K Matuszewski; A Freeman; H Quan; K C Lasseter; J C Mucklow; A G Porras Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 1995-09 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: D Y Mitchell; W H Barr; R A Eusebio; K A Stevens; F P Duke; D A Russell; J D Nesbitt; J H Powell; G A Thompson Journal: Pharm Res Date: 2001-02 Impact factor: 4.200
Authors: Sidney Klawansky; Eugene Komaroff; Paul F Cavanaugh; David Y Mitchell; Matthew J Gordon; Janet E Connelly; Susan D Ross Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2003-07-03 Impact factor: 4.507