Literature DB >> 10718390

Synergistic sedation with low-dose midazolam and propofol for colonoscopies.

F M Reimann1, U Samson, I Derad, M Fuchs, B Schiefer, E F Stange.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Patients undergoing colonoscopy are often sedated with benzodiazepines and long-acting opiates. Since low-dose midazolam also acts synergistically with short-acting propofol, we compared this synergistic sedation with a standard combination of midazolam and the opioid nalbuphine for colonoscopies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 79 patients presenting for colonoscopies were randomly assigned to the following protocols. Patients in group I (n = 32) received a median dose of 9 mg midazolam (interquartile range [IQR] 6 to 12); 20 patients (59%) needed additional nalbuphine (median 20 mg, IQR 10 to 20). Patients in group II (n = 47) received 2 mg midazolam and repeated injections of propofol (median 100 mg, IQR 53 to 145) with a maximal bolus of 50 mg.
RESULTS: Patients treated with the synergistic sedation (group II) recovered remarkably sooner after the procedure compared with those in group I, with a median time to discharge of 17 minutes vs. 93 minutes (P<0.001). Of the patients treated with analgosedation (group I), 28 % were unable to take part in a reaction time measurement and attention awareness test 1 hour after the procedure. All patients treated with the synergistic sedation were able to participate (P=0.002), and performed better. Despite a lower proportion of complete amnesia, patients treated with synergistic sedation more often rated the procedure as comfortable (81% vs. 50 %). Quality of sedation from the point of view of the endoscopist, and cardiorespiratory parameters, were similar in both groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose midazolam combined with propofol is an effective and economic alternative to benzodiazepine-based analgosedation. It is associated with a high degree of patient comfort and rapid recovery times, and has a potential cost benefit concerning nursing care and bed facilities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10718390     DOI: 10.1055/s-2000-134

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  14 in total

1.  Balanced propofol sedation administered by nonanesthesiologists: The first Italian experience.

Authors:  Alessandro Repici; Nico Pagano; Cesare Hassan; Alessandra Carlino; Giacomo Rando; Giuseppe Strangio; Fabio Romeo; Angelo Zullo; Elisa Ferrara; Eva Vitetta; Daniel de Paula Pessoa Ferreira; Silvio Danese; Massimo Arosio; Alberto Malesci
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  The Effect of Adding Midazolam to Propofol Intravenous Sedation to Suppress Gag Reflex During Dental Treatment.

Authors:  Toru Yamamoto; Keiko Fujii-Abe; Haruhisa Fukayama; Hiroshi Kawahara
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2018

3.  Obesity as a risk factor for sedation-related complications during propofol-mediated sedation for advanced endoscopic procedures.

Authors:  Sachin Wani; Riad Azar; Christine E Hovis; Robert M Hovis; Gregory A Cote; Matthew Hall; Lawrence Waldbaum; Vladimir Kushnir; Dayna Early; Daniel K Mullady; Faris Murad; Steven A Edmundowicz; Sreenivasa S Jonnalagadda
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  Efficacy and safety of a patient-positioning device (EZ-FIX) for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Authors:  Seungho Lee; Joung-Ho Han; Hee Seung Lee; Ki Bae Kim; In-Kwang Lee; Eun-Jong Cha; Young Duck Shin; Namgyu Park; Seon Mee Park
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Clinically important drug interactions with intravenous anaesthetics in older patients.

Authors:  Helge Eilers; Claus Niemann
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.923

6.  Bispectral index monitoring for nurse-administered propofol sedation during upper endoscopic ultrasound: a prospective, randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  John M DeWitt
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 7.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of patient-controlled sedation versus intravenous sedation for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Yi Lu; Li-Xiao Hao; Lu Chen; Zheng Jin; Biao Gong
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-11-15

8.  Efficacy of Bispectral Index Monitoring for Midazolam and Meperidine Induced Sedation during Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Study.

Authors:  Ki Joo Kang; Byung-Hoon Min; Mi Jung Lee; Hyun Sook Lim; Jin Yong Kim; Jun Haeng Lee; Dong Kyung Chang; Young-Ho Kim; Poong-Lyul Rhee; Jong Chul Rhee; Jae J Kim
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 4.519

9.  Comparison of midazolam alone versus midazolam plus propofol during endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Authors:  Young Shim Cho; Euikeun Seo; Jung-Ho Han; Soon Man Yoon; Hee Bok Chae; Seon Mee Park; Sei Jin Youn
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2011-09-30

Review 10.  Propofol for sedation during colonoscopy.

Authors:  Harminder Singh; William Poluha; Mary Cheung; Nicole Choptain; Ken I Baron; Shayne P Taback
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-10-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.