Literature DB >> 10718350

Negligent care and malpractice claiming behavior in Utah and Colorado.

D M Studdert1, E J Thomas, H R Burstin, B I Zbar, E J Orav, T A Brennan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous studies relating the incidence of negligent medical care to malpractice lawsuits in the United States may not be generalizable. These studies are based on data from 2 of the most populous states (California and New York), collected more than a decade ago, during volatile periods in the history of malpractice litigation.
OBJECTIVES: The study objectives were (1) to calculate how frequently negligent and nonnegligent management of patients in Utah and Colorado in 1992 led to malpractice claims and (2) to understand the characteristics of victims of negligent care who do not or cannot obtain compensation for their injuries from the medical malpractice system.
DESIGN: We linked medical malpractice claims data from Utah and Colorado with clinical data from a review of 14,700 medical records. We then analyzed characteristics of claimants and nonclaimants using evidence from their medical records about whether they had experienced a negligent adverse event. MEASURES: The study measures were negligent adverse events and medical malpractice claims.
RESULTS: Eighteen patients from our study sample filed claims: 14 were made in the absence of discernible negligence and 10 were made in the absence of any adverse event. Of the patients who suffered negligent injury in our study sample, 97% did not sue. Compared with patients who did sue for negligence occurring in 1992, these nonclaimants were more likely to be Medicare recipients (odds ratio [OR], 3.5; 95% CI [CI], 1.3 to 9.6), Medicaid recipients (OR, 3.6; 95% CI, 1.4 to 9.0), > or =75 years of age (OR, 7.0; 95% CI, 1.7 to 29.6), and low income earners (OR, 1.9; 95% CI, 0.9 to 4.2) and to have suffered minor disability as a result of their injury (OR, 6.3; 95% CI, 2.7 to 14.9).
CONCLUSIONS: The poor correlation between medical negligence and malpractice claims that was present in New York in 1984 is also present in Utah and Colorado in 1992. Paradoxically, the incidence of negligent adverse events exceeds the incidence of malpractice claims but when a physician is sued, there is a high probability that it will be for rendering nonnegligent care. The elderly and the poor are particularly likely to be among those who suffer negligence and do not sue, perhaps because their socioeconomic status inhibits opportunities to secure legal representation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10718350     DOI: 10.1097/00005650-200003000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  37 in total

1.  The errors of our ways.

Authors: 
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-07-23       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Coverage of patient safety terms in the UMLS metathesaurus.

Authors:  Aziz A Boxwala; Qing T Zeng; Anthony Chamberas; Luke Sato; Meghan Dierks
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2003

3.  Defensive medicine and tort reform: a wide view.

Authors:  David M Studdert; Michelle M Mello; Troyen A Brennan
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  What can hospitalized patients tell us about adverse events? Learning from patient-reported incidents.

Authors:  Saul N Weingart; Odelya Pagovich; Daniel Z Sands; Joseph M Li; Mark D Aronson; Roger B Davis; David W Bates; Russell S Phillips
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  "Health courts" and accountability for patient safety.

Authors:  Michelle M Mello; David M Studdert; Allen B Kachalia; Troyen A Brennan
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.911

Review 6.  The regulation of medical malpractice in Japan.

Authors:  Robert B Leflar
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-11-11       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 7.  Disclosure of adverse events and errors in surgical care: challenges and strategies for improvement.

Authors:  Lauren E Lipira; Thomas H Gallagher
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Medical malpractice: can we rescue a decaying system?

Authors:  Christopher M Burkle
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 7.616

9.  Organization and representation of patient safety data: current status and issues around generalizability and scalability.

Authors:  Aziz A Boxwala; Meghan Dierks; Maura Keenan; Susan Jackson; Robert Hanscom; David W Bates; Luke Sato
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2004-08-06       Impact factor: 4.497

10.  Health and life insurance as an alternative to malpractice tort law.

Authors:  Walton Sumner
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.