Literature DB >> 10718168

Determinants of youth tobacco use in West Virginia: a comparison of smoking and smokeless tobacco use.

K A Horn1, X Gao, G A Dino, S Kamal-Bahl.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To identify and compare the determinants of different types of tobacco use among rural youths and discuss the implication of these differences for youth tobacco use cessation.
METHODS: Ninth grade participants (n = 883) were 95% white, between 13 and 19 years old with a mean age of 14.6 years. Students were classified into four exclusive groups: non-tobacco use, smoking only, smokeless tobacco (ST) use only, and conjoint smoking and ST use. The influences of 14 specific risk factors on tobacco use were investigated for each group using separate multiple logistic regression analyses.
RESULTS: Among participants, 20% were smokers only, 6% were ST users only, and 10% were conjoint users. Students who had more friends (odds ratio [OR] =] 2.75) and siblings (OR = 1.96) who smoke, family problems (OR = 1.70), and favorable attitudes toward tobacco use (OR = 1.12) were more likely to smoke than were other students. Among students who used only ST, gender was a primary determinant (95% were male). Excluding gender, sibling ST use (OR = 4.28), friends' ST use (OR = 1.71), and favorable attitudes (OR = 1.11) were the most significant risk factors. Male students were also more likely to use both cigarettes and ST (OR = 8.62). In addition, among students who used both tobacco products, siblings' and friends' ST use were significant (OR = 3.09 and 2.13, respectively), as well as family problems (OR = 2.41) and attitude (OR = 1.15). Unlike smokers only or ST users only, lack of knowledge about tobacco was a significant determinant among conjoint users (OR = 1.39).
CONCLUSIONS: Findings revealed that 7 of 14 factors were significant predictors of tobacco use. Some factors predicted smoking only, ST only, and conjoint use; however, the pattern of predictors varied for these three categories. Implications for these findings as they relate to tobacco use interventions are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10718168     DOI: 10.1081/ada-100100595

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse        ISSN: 0095-2990            Impact factor:   3.829


  6 in total

Review 1.  Impact of differing definitions of dual tobacco use: implications for studying dual use and a call for operational definitions.

Authors:  Robert C Klesges; Jon O Ebbert; Glen D Morgan; Deborah Sherrill-Mittleman; Taghrid Asfar; Wayne G Talcott; Margaret Debon
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 4.244

2.  Psychosocial correlates of smokeless tobacco use among Indiana adolescents.

Authors:  Matthew Lee Smith; Brian Colwell; Chanese A Forté; Jairus C Pulczinski; E Lisako J McKyer
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2015-04

3.  Association of smokeless tobacco use and smoking in adolescents in the United States: an analysis of data from the Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System survey, 2011.

Authors:  R Constance Wiener
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.634

4.  Smoking mothers and snuffing fathers: behavioural influences on youth tobacco use in a Swedish cohort.

Authors:  K I Rosendahl; M R Galanti; H Gilljam; A Ahlbom
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 7.552

5.  Appalachian women's perceptions of their community's health threats.

Authors:  Nancy E Schoenberg; Jennifer Hatcher; Mark B Dignan
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.333

6.  Concurrent use of cigarettes and smokeless tobacco among US males and females.

Authors:  Nasir Mushtaq; Mary B Williams; Laura A Beebe
Journal:  J Environ Public Health       Date:  2012-05-16
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.