Literature DB >> 10718059

Recent and remote extinction cues reduce spontaneous recovery.

D C Brooks1.   

Abstract

Five appetitive conditioning experiments with rats examined the ability of extinction cues (ECs) to reduce spontaneous recovery after extinction procedures that varied the temporal relation between the ECs and the conditioned stimulus (CS) and included presentations of additional events (e.g. other stimuli correlated with extinction, CSs, and the US). In extinction, two different ECs were presented either closely in time before (i.e. recent to), or more distant (i.e. remote) from a nonreinforced CS. Both recent and remote ECs reduced spontaneous recovery to the CS when present during testing (Experiments 1-4). Each EC reduced recovery despite the addition during extinction of a second EC and CS (Experiments 1, 3, and 4), and the US (Experiment 3). Experiments 4 and 5 investigated the recent and remote ECs' tendency to control a serial occasion setting discrimination involving the target CS under explicit training conditions. Neither EC gained such discriminative control. Possible explanations of the results are discussed, including configural learning, occasion setting, and contextual cue control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10718059     DOI: 10.1080/027249900392986

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B        ISSN: 0272-4995


  22 in total

1.  Recovery effects after extinction in the Morris swimming pool navigation task.

Authors:  José Prados; Raúl D Manteiga; Joan Sansa
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Interaction of retention interval with CS-preexposure and extinction treatments: symmetry with respect to primacy.

Authors:  Daniel S Wheeler; Steven C Stout; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Factors mediating alcohol craving and relapse: stress, compulsivity, and genetics.

Authors:  Zachary A Rodd; Kristin K Anstrom; Darin J Knapp; Ildiko Racz; Andreas Zimmer; Salvatore Serra; Richard L Bell; Donald J Woodward; George R Breese; Giancarlo Colombo
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.455

4.  The Orexin-1 Receptor Antagonist SB-334867 Reduces Alcohol Relapse Drinking, but not Alcohol-Seeking, in Alcohol-Preferring (P) Rats.

Authors:  Ronnie Dhaher; Sheketha R Hauser; Bruk Getachew; Richard L Bell; William J McBride; David L McKinzie; Zachary A Rodd
Journal:  J Addict Med       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.702

5.  Nicotine modulates alcohol-seeking and relapse by alcohol-preferring (P) rats in a time-dependent manner.

Authors:  Sheketha R Hauser; Bruk Getachew; Scott M Oster; Ronnie Dhaher; Zheng-Ming Ding; Richard L Bell; William J McBride; Zachary A Rodd
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 3.455

6.  D1 receptors in the nucleus accumbens-shell, but not the core, are involved in mediating ethanol-seeking behavior of alcohol-preferring (P) rats.

Authors:  S R Hauser; G A Deehan; R Dhaher; C P Knight; J A Wilden; W J McBride; Z A Rodd
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 3.590

Review 7.  Modeling relapse in animals.

Authors:  Rémi Martin-Fardon; Friedbert Weiss
Journal:  Curr Top Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013

8.  Parameters of Context-Induced Ethanol (EtOH)-Seeking in Alcohol-Preferring (P) Rats: Temporal Analysis, Effects of Repeated Deprivation, and EtOH Priming Injections.

Authors:  Sheketha R Hauser; Gerald A Deehan; Christopher P Knight; Jamie E Toalston; William J McBride; Zachary A Rodd
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 3.455

Review 9.  Extinction of instrumental (operant) learning: interference, varieties of context, and mechanisms of contextual control.

Authors:  Mark E Bouton
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 10.  Why behavior change is difficult to sustain.

Authors:  Mark E Bouton
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2014-06-15       Impact factor: 4.018

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.