Literature DB >> 10717781

Evaluation of prostate-specific antigen as a quantifiable indicator of condom failure in clinical trials.

T L Walsh1, R G Frezieres, A L Nelson, B G Wraxall, V A Clark.   

Abstract

The ability of condoms to retain all elements of semen during intercourse has been assessed by postcoital visual inspection and in vitro permeability studies. Yet, these observations may not be sufficiently precise or realistic. This pilot study evaluated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) as a semen marker of inapparent failure of the condom barrier under conditions of actual use. Twelve couples collected samples from the vagina and surfaces of the condom using sterile cotton swabs. We obtained precoital and postcoital samples for 24 acts of unprotected intercourse, 54 acts of intercourse using intact condoms, and 40 acts of intercourse using condoms that had been deliberately punctured. We used electrophoresis to determine the amount of PSA present in the samples. PSA was detected in 100% (24/24) of vaginal samples collected immediately after unprotected intercourse and in none of the vaginal samples collected more than 24 h after intercourse (0/90). PSA was also present in 98% (83/85) of the samples collected from the inside of the condom that had failed during intercourse. Excluding uses where the condom failed during intercourse, PSA was detected in 2% (1/47) of the postcoital vaginal samples collected after use of intact condoms and in 41% (14/34) of the samples collected after use of condoms with known 1-mm punctures. We conclude that PSA shows great promise as a semen biomarker in clinical trials of barrier methods. We recommend that future studies further investigate the ability of this biomarker to identify condom failures and quantify the extent of semen exposure associated with various types of condom failures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antigens; Barrier Methods; Biology; Clinical Research; Clinical Trials; Condom; Condom Failure; Contraception; Contraceptive Methods; Family Planning; Immunity; Immunologic Factors; Physiology; Research Methodology; Research Report

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10717781     DOI: 10.1016/s0010-7824(99)00098-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  10 in total

1.  Objective non-intrusive markers of sperm production and sexual activity.

Authors:  Thilee Sivananthan; Franz Bathur; Mark Jimenez; Ann Conway; Amanda Idan; David Handelsman
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2012-04-23       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 2.  Effectiveness of female controlled barrier methods in preventing sexually transmitted infections and HIV: current evidence and future research directions.

Authors:  A M Minnis; N S Padian
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.519

3.  The use of biomarkers of semen exposure in sexual and reproductive health studies.

Authors:  Margaret Christine Snead; Carolyn M Black; Athena P Kourtis
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 2.681

4.  Biomarker validation of self-reported sex among middle-aged female sex workers in China.

Authors:  Jennifer Guida; Ami Fukunaga; Hongjie Liu
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 3.797

5.  Prostate-specific antigen as a biomarker of condom failure: comparison of three laboratory assays and self-reported condom use problems in a randomized trial of female condom performance.

Authors:  Terri Walsh; Lee Warner; Maurizio Macaluso; Ron Frezieres; Margaret Snead; Brian Wraxall
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2012-03-02       Impact factor: 3.375

6.  Biological Validation of Self-Reported Unprotected Sex and Comparison of Underreporting Over Two Different Recall Periods Among Female Sex Workers in Benin.

Authors:  Katia Giguère; Luc Béhanzin; Fernand A Guédou; François A Leblond; Ella Goma-Matsétsé; Djimon M Zannou; Dissou Affolabi; René K Kêkê; Flore Gangbo; Moussa Bachabi; Michel Alary
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 3.835

7.  Optimal methods for collecting and storing vaginal specimens for prostate-specific antigen testing in research studies.

Authors:  Maria F Gallo; Margaret C Snead; Carolyn M Black; Teresa M Brown; Athena P Kourtis; Denise J Jamieson; Marion Carter; Ana Penman-Aguilar; Maurizio Macaluso
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 3.375

8.  Assessment of the vaginal residence time of biomarkers of semen exposure.

Authors:  Andrea Thurman; Terry Jacot; Johan Melendez; Thomas Kimble; Margaret Snead; Roxanne Jamshidi; Angie Wheeless; David F Archer; Gustavo F Doncel; Christine Mauck
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 3.375

9.  Comparison of self-reported female condom failure and biomarker-confirmed semen exposure.

Authors:  Terri L Walsh; Margaret C Snead; Breione J St Claire; Jill L Schwartz; Christine K Mauck; Ron G Frezieres; Diana L Blithe; David F Archer; Kurt T Barnhart; Jeffrey T Jensen; Anita L Nelson; Michael A Thomas; Livia S Wan; Mark A Weaver
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 3.375

10.  HIV-1 Nucleic Acids Identify Rectal HIV Exposures in Self-Collected Rectal Swabs, Whereas Y-Chromosome Single Tandem Repeat Mixtures Are Not Reliable Biomarkers of Condomless Receptive Anal Intercourse.

Authors:  Maria P Lemos; Vijay Nandi; Joan Dragavon; Ira Fleming; Keertana Krishnan; Martin Musuruana; Madeline Kramer; Hayley Glantz; Michele Andrasik; Robert W Coombs; M Juliana McElrath; Hong-Van Tieu
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 3.771

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.