Literature DB >> 10717625

The feasibility of minimally invasive surgery for stage IIA, IIB, and IIIA breast carcinoma patients after tumor downstaging with induction chemotherapy.

G Vlastos1, N Q Mirza, J T Lenert, K K Hunt, F C Ames, B W Feig, M I Ross, A U Buzdar, S E Singletary.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Induction chemotherapy (IC) has become the standard of care for locally advanced breast carcinoma, frequently downstaging both the primary tumor and the axilla, and making patients eligible for less invasive surgical procedures. The usefulness of IC in earlier stage operable breast carcinoma is now being considered.
METHODS: This study involved a subset of 129 patients from a series of 174 with T2-3, N0-1, M0 or T1, N1, M0 breast carcinoma (Stage IIA, IIB, or IIIA ) who were registered in a prospective IC trial using paclitaxel or a combination of fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FAC). The subset included patients who had received no preoperative radiation therapy but had completed 3-5 cycles of induction chemotherapy and had undergone a Level I-II axillary lymph node dissection. The objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of induction chemotherapy with paclitaxel or FAC in downstaging the primary tumor and axillary metastases in these early stage breast carcinoma patients.
RESULTS: The median initial tumor size was 4 cm (range, 0.6-10.0); after IC, tumor size was downstaged to 1.6 cm (range, 0.0-7.0) (P < 0.0001). Clinical response to IC was complete in 24% of patients and partial in 36%. Primary tumor shrinkage was similar with paclitaxel and FAC. Among patients clinically classified as N1, 34% became histologically negative and 38% had only 1-3 positive lymph nodes after induction chemotherapy.
CONCLUSIONS: IC with paclitaxel or FAC resulted in effective downstaging of primary tumors and axillary metastases in patients with Stage IIA, IIB, and IIIA breast carcinoma. However, a significant proportion of patients still had residual but low volume microscopic disease; such disease status may allow minimally invasive surgical approaches to locoregional therapy. Copyright 2000 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10717625     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(20000315)88:6<1417::aid-cncr20>3.0.co;2-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  11 in total

1.  Comparison of mammography, sonography, MRI and clinical examination in patients with locally advanced or inflammatory breast cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  H J Shin; H H Kim; J H Ahn; S-B Kim; K H Jung; G Gong; B H Son; S H Ahn
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Accuracy of physical examination, ultrasonography, and mammography in predicting residual pathologic tumor size in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Anees B Chagpar; Lavinia P Middleton; Aysegul A Sahin; Peter Dempsey; Aman U Buzdar; Attiqa N Mirza; Fredrick C Ames; Gildy V Babiera; Barry W Feig; Kelly K Hunt; Henry M Kuerer; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Merrick I Ross; S Eva Singletary
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 3.  Local Recurrence after Breast-Conserving Surgery and Mastectomy Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Breast Cancer - a Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Xiaodong Zhou; Yujie Li
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Utility of FDG-PET/CT in the evaluation of the response of locally advanced breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Kei Ogino; Masanobu Nakajima; Miyako Kakuta; Mitsuhiro Hayashi; Satoru Yamaguchi; Takashi Tsuchioka; Keiichi Kubota; Setsu Sakamoto; Hiroyuki Kato
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug

5.  Long-term outcome of neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced breast carcinoma: effective clinical downstaging allows breast preservation and predicts outstanding local control and survival.

Authors:  William G Cance; Lisa A Carey; Benjamin F Calvo; Carolyn Sartor; Lynda Sawyer; Dominic T Moore; Julian Rosenman; David W Ollila; Mark Graham
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 6.  Axillary recurrence after a tumor-positive sentinel lymph node biopsy without axillary treatment: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Claire M T P Francissen; Pim J M Dings; Thijs van Dalen; Luc J A Strobbe; Hanneke W M van Laarhoven; Johannes H W de Wilt
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Sentinel lymph node biopsy alone after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with initial cytology-proven axillary node metastasis.

Authors:  Ji Young Kim; Min Kuk Kim; Jeong Eon Lee; Yongsik Jung; Soo Youn Bae; Se Kyung Lee; Won Ho Kil; Seok Won Kim; Ku Sang Kim; Seok Jin Nam; Sehwan Han
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 3.588

8.  Outcome of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer: A tertiary care centre experience.

Authors:  Tapesh Bhattacharyya; Suresh C Sharma; Budhi Singh Yadav; Rajinder Singh; Gurpreet Singh
Journal:  Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol       Date:  2014-07

Review 9.  Oncological outcome of complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast conserving surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xuan Li; Danian Dai; Bo Chen; Hailin Tang; Weidong Wei
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 2.754

10.  Use of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Axillary Node-Positive Breast Cancer in Diagnosis.

Authors:  Hee Jun Choi; Isaac Kim; Emad Alsharif; Sungmin Park; Jae-Myung Kim; Jai Min Ryu; Seok Jin Nam; Seok Won Kim; Jonghan Yu; Se Kyung Lee; Jeong Eon Lee
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2018-11-23       Impact factor: 3.588

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.