Literature DB >> 10717252

Effect of low molecular weight heparin (Certoparin) versus unfractionated heparin on cancer survival following breast and pelvic cancer surgery: A prospective randomized double-blind trial.

G F von Tempelhoff1, J Harenberg, F Niemann, G Hommel, C J Kirkpatrick, L Heilmann.   

Abstract

Recent studies suggest that low molecular weight heparin (LMW heparin) therapy in malignancy may improve cancer survival following surgical resection. We studied prospectively whether cancer mortality during follow-up in women with previously untreated breast, and pelvic cancer is reduced in those who randomly received LMW heparin (Certoparin) compared to patients given unfractionated heparin (UF heparin) for thrombosis prophylaxis during primary surgery. In a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial, 160 patients received Certoparin and 164 UF heparin until post-operatively day 7. Survival estimations are based on the outcome data from a subset of 140 LMW heparin - and 147 UF heparin recipients. Long-term survival in the Certoparin group compared to the UF heparin group was significantly improved after 650 days (P=0. 0066) but not thereafter when analysis was performed on all cancer cell types combined. In the probability estimates survival benefit within this time was restricted to patients with pelvic cancer but was not observed in breast cancer. However, in breast cancer patients who received LMW heparin the impact of classical tumor prognostic markers was statistically significant after 1,050 days but not after 650 days. Thus, breast cancer patients with unfavorable prognosis seem to benefit in terms of survival advantage from LMW heparin within the 650 days after surgery. These results suggest that improvement in cancer survival can be achieved after even a short course of treatment with LMWH (compared to UFH) given for DVT prophylaxis in the post-operative period. An effect of UFH on disease outcome is not excluded. Further definitive trials of LMWH vs. placebo for cancer outcome (rather then DVT) using doses and schedules that may be more optimal are indicated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10717252     DOI: 10.3892/ijo.16.4.815

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oncol        ISSN: 1019-6439            Impact factor:   5.650


  23 in total

Review 1.  Anticoagulation, ferrotoxicity and the future of translational lung cancer research.

Authors:  Leo R Zacharski
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2016-06

2.  Selective antimetastatic effect of heparins in preclinical human melanoma models is based on inhibition of migration and microvascular arrest.

Authors:  Bíborka Bereczky; Réka Gilly; Erzsébet Rásó; Agnes Vágó; József Tímár; József Tóvári
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.150

Review 3.  Heparin: 100 years of pleiotropic effects.

Authors:  Adilson Ferraz Paschoa
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 4.  Molecular pathology of tumor metastasis III. Target array and combinatorial therapies.

Authors:  József Tímár; Andrea Ladányi; István Peták; András Jeney; László Kopper
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2003-04-18       Impact factor: 3.201

5.  Binding and inhibition of drug transport proteins by heparin: a potential drug transporter modulator capable of reducing multidrug resistance in human cancer cells.

Authors:  Yunliang Chen; Michael Scully; Gloria Petralia; Ajay Kakkar
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 4.742

Review 6.  Prophylactic and therapeutic anticoagulation for thrombosis: major issues in oncology.

Authors:  Marc Carrier; Agnes Y Y Lee
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Oncol       Date:  2008-10-28

7.  Inhibition of osteolytic bone metastasis by unfractionated heparin.

Authors:  Colin K Yee; Martin Butcher; Melec Zeadin; Jeffrey I Weitz; Stephen G Shaughnessy
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 5.150

8.  Sucrose octasulfate regulates fibroblast growth factor-2 binding, transport, and activity: potential for regulation of tumor growth.

Authors:  Michael Fannon; Kimberly Forsten-Williams; Matthew A Nugent; Kalvin J Gregory; Chia Lin Chu; Adrienne L Goerges-Wildt; Dipak Panigrahy; Arja Kaipainen; Carmen Barnes; Cathy Lapp; Yuen Shing
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 6.384

9.  Effect of Fraxiparine, a type of low molecular weight heparin, on the invasion and metastasis of lung adenocarcinoma A549 cells.

Authors:  Chuan-Jiang Yu; Su-Juan Ye; Zhi-Hua Feng; Wen-Jing Ou; Xi-Kun Zhou; Ling-Dong Li; Yong-Qiu Mao; Wen Zhu; Yu-Quan Wei
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 10.  Resistance mechanisms of gastrointestinal cancers: why does conventional chemotherapy fail?

Authors:  F Gieseler; P Rudolph; G Kloeppel; U R Foelsch
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2003-05-28       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.