H Watabe1, C J Endres, A Breier, B Schmall, W C Eckelman, R E Carson. 1. PET Department, Clinical Center, and Experimental Therapeutics Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-1180, USA.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: PET studies with [11C]raclopride provide an indirect measure of changes in synaptic dopamine. Previously, we used the bolus-plus-infusion (B/I) method to assess dopamine response from the percentage change in binding potential (deltaBP) before and after administration of amphetamine. The goal of this work is to optimize the measurement of changes in neurotransmitter with the B/I method by choosing the optimal timing for pre- and poststimulus scanning. METHODS: Two sources of variability in deltaBP were considered: within-subject and between-subject noise. A noise model based on a phantom study and human data was used to evaluate the within-subject noise. For between-subject noise, simulated time--activity curves were generated from measured [11C]raclopride input functions. Optimal timing to measure deltaBP was determined and applied to human data. RESULTS: According to the simulation study, the optimal scan times for pre-and poststimulus scans were 39-50 and 58-100 min, respectively. The optimal timing resulted in a 28% noise reduction compared with the original timing. By applying the optimal timing to human studies, the statistical significance of the difference in deltaBP between patients with schizophrenia and healthy volunteers increased from P = 0.038 to 0.012. CONCLUSION: Careful assessment of the sources of noise in receptor imaging studies can increase the sensitivity of the B/I method for the detection of biologic signals.
UNLABELLED: PET studies with [11C]raclopride provide an indirect measure of changes in synaptic dopamine. Previously, we used the bolus-plus-infusion (B/I) method to assess dopamine response from the percentage change in binding potential (deltaBP) before and after administration of amphetamine. The goal of this work is to optimize the measurement of changes in neurotransmitter with the B/I method by choosing the optimal timing for pre- and poststimulus scanning. METHODS: Two sources of variability in deltaBP were considered: within-subject and between-subject noise. A noise model based on a phantom study and human data was used to evaluate the within-subject noise. For between-subject noise, simulated time--activity curves were generated from measured [11C]raclopride input functions. Optimal timing to measure deltaBP was determined and applied to human data. RESULTS: According to the simulation study, the optimal scan times for pre-and poststimulus scans were 39-50 and 58-100 min, respectively. The optimal timing resulted in a 28% noise reduction compared with the original timing. By applying the optimal timing to human studies, the statistical significance of the difference in deltaBP between patients with schizophrenia and healthy volunteers increased from P = 0.038 to 0.012. CONCLUSION: Careful assessment of the sources of noise in receptor imaging studies can increase the sensitivity of the B/I method for the detection of biologic signals.
Authors: Arthur L Brody; Mark A Mandelkern; Richard E Olmstead; David Scheibal; Emily Hahn; Sharon Shiraga; Eleanor Zamora-Paja; Judah Farahi; Sanjaya Saxena; Edythe D London; James T McCracken Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2006-07
Authors: Marta Peciña; Mercedes Martínez-Jauand; Tiffany Love; Joseph Heffernan; Pedro Montoya; Colin Hodgkinson; Christian S Stohler; David Goldman; Jon-Kar Zubieta Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2014-04-23 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Kati Alakurtti; Jarkko J Johansson; Juho Joutsa; Matti Laine; Lars Bäckman; Lars Nyberg; Juha O Rinne Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2015-04-08 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: Arthur L Brody; Edythe D London; Richard E Olmstead; Zoe Allen-Martinez; Stephanie Shulenberger; Matthew R Costello; Anna L Abrams; David Scheibal; Judah Farahi; Steven Shoptaw; Mark A Mandelkern Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2010-08-03 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: Sargo Aalto; Kimmo Ingman; Kati Alakurtti; Valtteri Kaasinen; Jussi Virkkala; Kjell Någren; Juha O Rinne; Harry Scheinin Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2014-12-10 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: Arthur L Brody; Mark A Mandelkern; Richard E Olmstead; Zoe Allen-Martinez; David Scheibal; Anna L Abrams; Matthew R Costello; Judah Farahi; Sanjaya Saxena; John Monterosso; Edythe D London Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2008-06-18 Impact factor: 7.853