Literature DB >> 10716296

Longitudinal distance standards of fetal growth. Intrauterine and Infant Longitudinal Growth Study: IILGS.

E Di Battista1, E Bertino, L Benso, C Fabris, G Aicardi, M Pagliano, A Bossi, P De Biasio, S Milani.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Most ultrasonographic fetal growth norms are derived from cross-sectional data or from longitudinal data treated as coming from cross-sectional studies, although only longitudinal models may detect particular aspects of fetal growth shape, such as peak of growth velocity.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The sample included 238 singleton normal pregnancies. All the fetal traits under study (biparietal diameter, occipito-frontal diameter, head circumference, femur diaphysis length and abdomen circumference) were measured according to the classical ultrasound techniques by highly trained operators. Individual growth profiles (made up of 5 to 9 measures) were taken at regular intervals between the 12th and the 40th week. Growth norms were traced by means of a two-stage linear model: (I) a 3-constant fetal growth function was fitted to each individual growth profile, (II) growth centiles were based upon the weighted mean and covariance matrix of the individual growth constants.
RESULTS: Fetal growth curves show a sigmoid shape with a maximum slope (i.e. a peak growth velocity) which occurs earlier for head diameters (about 18 weeks), later for femur diaphysis length (20 weeks) and abdomen circumference (22 weeks). During intrauterine growth, all traits show a progressive increase in interindividual variability, which is more prominent for abdomen circumference.
CONCLUSION: The mathematical model applied to a large sample of growth profiles provided a satisfactory description of the individual fetal development and its biological variability, and allowed the construction of longitudinal distance standards useful for clinical purposes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10716296

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand        ISSN: 0001-6349            Impact factor:   3.636


  5 in total

Review 1.  Neonatal anthropometric charts: what they are, what they are not.

Authors:  E Bertino; S Milani; C Fabris; M De Curtis
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 5.747

Review 2.  Defining normal and abnormal fetal growth: promises and challenges.

Authors:  Jun Zhang; Mario Merialdi; Lawrence D Platt; Michael S Kramer
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 3.  Fetal Growth Curves: Is There a Universal Reference?

Authors:  Katherine L Grantz
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 2.838

4.  Scientific basis for standardization of fetal head measurements by ultrasound: a reproducibility study.

Authors:  R Napolitano; V Donadono; E O Ohuma; C L Knight; S Z Wanyonyi; B Kemp; T Norris; A T Papageorghiou
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 7.299

5.  An outcome-based approach for the creation of fetal growth standards: do singletons and twins need separate standards?

Authors:  K S Joseph; John Fahey; Robert W Platt; Robert M Liston; Shoo K Lee; Reg Sauve; Shiliang Liu; Alexander C Allen; Michael S Kramer
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 4.897

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.