Literature DB >> 10716106

Occlusal results after open or closed treatment of fractures of the mandibular condylar process.

E Ellis1, P Simon, G S Throckmorton.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study compared the occlusal relationships after open or closed treatment for fractures of the mandibular condylar process. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 137 patients with unilateral fractures of the mandibular condylar process (neck or subcondylar), 77 treated closed and 65 treated open, were included in this study. Standardized occlusal photographs obtained at several postsurgical time intervals were examined and scored by a surgeon and an orthodontist. Standard statistical methods were used to assess differences between groups.
RESULTS: Patients treated by closed techniques had a significantly greater percentage of malocclusion compared with patients treated by open reduction, in spite of the fact that the initial displacement of the fractures was greater in patients treated by open reduction.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on this study, more consistent occlusal results can be expected when fractures of the mandibular condylar process are treated by open reduction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10716106     DOI: 10.1016/s0278-2391(00)90047-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  21 in total

1.  Posttraumatic temporomandibular joint disorders.

Authors:  Helen E Giannakopoulos; Peter D Quinn; Eric Granquist; Joli C Chou
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2009-05

2.  Development and Clinical Evaluation of MatrixMANDIBLE Subcondylar Plates System (Synthes).

Authors:  Roberto Cortelazzi; Mario Altacera; Monica Turco; Viviana Antonicelli; Michele De Benedittis
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2014-10-31

Review 3.  Mandible Fractures.

Authors:  Brent B Pickrell; Arman T Serebrakian; Renata S Maricevich
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.314

4.  Applications of the endoscope in facial fracture management.

Authors:  Chen Lee; Marcin Czerwinski
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.314

5.  Pearls of mandibular trauma management.

Authors:  John C Koshy; Evan M Feldman; Chuma J Chike-Obi; Jamal M Bullocks
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.314

6.  [Transoral osteosynthesis of condylar neck fractures using a three-dimensional plate].

Authors:  G Lauer; W Pradel; M Schneider; U Eckelt
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2006-09

7.  Assessment of masticatory function using bite force measurements in patients treated for mandibular fractures.

Authors:  Deborah Sybil; K Gopalkrishnan
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2013-09-26

8.  Evaluation of Retro Mandibular Approach to Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Condylar Fractures: A Cross-sectional Study.

Authors:  J K Dayashankara Rao; Neelima Gehlot; Vijay Siwach
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2013-08-06

9.  Prospective closed treatment of nondisplaced and nondislocated condylar neck and head fractures versus open reposition internal fixation of displaced and dislocated fractures.

Authors:  Constantin A Landes; Kai Day; Ruben Lipphardt; Robert Sader
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2008-07

10.  Management of Subcondylar Fracture through Intraoral Approach with Rigid Internal Fixation.

Authors:  Ravi S Patil; Santosh S Gudi
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2011-04-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.