Literature DB >> 10715984

Fecal continence following partial resection of the anal canal in distal rectal cancer: long-term results after coloanal anastomoses.

R Gamagami1, G Istvan, P Cabarrot, A Liagre, P Chiotasso, F Lazorthes.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to assess the influence of partial excision of the superior portion of the anal canal (AC) when necessary for tumor margin clearance in distal rectal cancer on fecal continence after coloanal anastomoses.
METHODS: Between 1977 to 1993, 209 patients with middle and lower third rectal cancers underwent complete rectal excision and coloanal anastomoses. For very low tumors, located at or below 5 cm from the anal verge (AV), varying portions of the superior segment of the AC were excised for tumor margin clearance. The magnitude of resections was inversely proportional to the height of the anastomosis from the AV. The patients were categorized into 3 groups according to their level of anastomoses from AV: group 1, patients with anastomoses from 0.5 to less than 2 cm from AV (1 to 2.5 cm of AC resected, i.e., major resection); group 2, anastomoses at 2 to less than 3 cm from AV (less than 1 cm of AC resected, i.e., minor resection); group 3, with anastomoses at 3 to 3.5 cm from AV (AC completely preserved). A standard questionnaire, physical examination, and anal manometry at intervals of 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 months were performed prospectively to assess anal continence.
RESULTS: The patients in the 3 categories were matched for age, gender, stage, presence or absence of a colonic J-pouch, preoperative neoadjuvant radiotherapy and surgical technique. Fourteen patients with postoperative radiotherapy were excluded from the clinical assessment. Mean follow-up was 33.5 months. There were 43 patients in group 1, 75 in group 2, and 73 in group 3 for clinical assessment. In the first year, there was progressive improvement in anal continence in all 3 groups. At 2 years, 50% in group 1, 73% in group 2, and 62% in group 3 were fully continent. The proportion of patients fully continent in group 1 remained unchanged as compared to continued improvement for groups 2 and 3 following the first year. At 4 years, 50% in group 1, 80% in group 2, and 68% in group 3 were completely continent. The difference among the 3 groups was not statistically significant.
CONCLUSIONS: For distal rectal cancer, where tumor margin clearance necessitates partial resection of the superior portion of the AC, when limited to less than 1 cm, the proportion of patients remaining fully continent is similar to those with complete AC preservation. More substantial excisions of the AC can still result in satisfactory anal continence, such that following the fourth year, one half of the patients can expect to be fully continent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10715984     DOI: 10.1067/msy.2000.103487

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  19 in total

1.  [Reconstructive surgery after anterior resection of the rectum].

Authors:  S Willis; V Schumpelick
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 2.  A review on functional results of sphincter-saving surgery for rectal cancer: the anterior resection syndrome.

Authors:  Filippo Pucciani
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2013-06-11

3.  Anal sphincter asymmetry in anal incontinence after restorative proctectomy for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Sung-Bum Kang; Nayoung Kim; Kyoung-Ho Lee; Young-Hoon Kim; Jee Hyun Kim; Jae-Sung Kim
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 4.  Intersphincteric Resection Pushing the Envelope for Sphincter Preservation.

Authors:  Quentin Denost; Eric Rullier
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2017-11-27

5.  Outcomes of ultra-low anterior resection combined with or without intersphincteric resection in lower rectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Jin C Kim; Chang S Yu; Seok-B Lim; Chan W Kim; In J Park; Yong S Yoon
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-07-05       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Sphincter-saving resection for all rectal carcinomas: the end of the 2-cm distal rule.

Authors:  Eric Rullier; Christophe Laurent; Frédéric Bretagnol; Anne Rullier; Véronique Vendrely; Frank Zerbib
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Restorative proctectomy with colon pouch-anal anastomosis by laparoscopic transanal pull-through: an available option for low rectal cancer?

Authors:  F Prete; F P Prete; R De Luca; P Nitti; D Sammarco; G Preziosa
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-10-23       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Preoperative radiochemotherapy and sphincter-saving resection for T3 carcinomas of the lower third of the rectum.

Authors:  E Rullier; B Goffre; C Bonnel; F Zerbib; M Caudry; J Saric
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Preoperative parameters expanding the indication of sphincter preserving surgery in patients with advanced low rectal cancer.

Authors:  Hideki Ueno; Hidetaka Mochizuki; Yojiro Hashiguchi; Keiichi Ishikawa; Hajime Fujimoto; Eiji Shinto; Kazuo Hase
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 10.  Evolving treatment strategies for colorectal cancer: a critical review of current therapeutic options.

Authors:  Daniel C Damin; Anderson R Lazzaron
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.