Literature DB >> 10715366

Efficacy, cycle control, and side effects of low- and lower-dose oral contraceptives: a randomized trial of 20 micrograms and 35 micrograms estrogen preparations.

M J Rosenberg1, A Meyers, V Roy.   

Abstract

Estrogen content represents a tradeoff between cycle control and side effects, but few direct comparisons of 20 and 30/35 micrograms preparations are available. To address this issue, we conducted a randomized, open-label multicenter clinical trial comparing Alesse (20 micrograms ethinyl estradiol [EE]), Mircette (20 micrograms EE), and Ortho Tri-Cyclen (35 micrograms EE) among 463 OC starters or switchers. Bloating, breast tenderness, and nausea were approximately 50% more common in women using 35 micrograms EE as compared to 20 micrograms EE preparations. Cycle control was similar in all products, although during the first two cycles among starters; users of Mircette and Ortho Tri-Cyclen (Tri-Cyclen) exhibited better cycle control than Alesse users. Discontinuation and pregnancy rates were not significantly higher in 35 micrograms EE users.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Americas; Clinical Research; Contraception; Contraceptive Agents; Contraceptive Agents, Estrogen; Contraceptive Agents, Female; Contraceptive Effectiveness; Contraceptive Methods--side effects; Contraceptive Usage; Developed Countries; Family Planning; Method Acceptability; North America; Northern America; Oral Contraceptives, Low-dose--side effects; Oral Contraceptives--side effects; Research Methodology; Research Report; United States; Use-effectiveness

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10715366     DOI: 10.1016/s0010-7824(99)00109-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  20 in total

Review 1.  Triphasic versus monophasic oral contraceptives for contraception.

Authors:  Huib A A M Van Vliet; David A Grimes; Laureen M Lopez; Kenneth F Schulz; Frans M Helmerhorst
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-11-09

Review 2.  Choosing a combined oral contraceptive pill.

Authors:  Mary Stewart; Kirsten Black
Journal:  Aust Prescr       Date:  2015-02-02

Review 3.  20 µg versus >20 µg estrogen combined oral contraceptives for contraception.

Authors:  Maria F Gallo; Kavita Nanda; David A Grimes; Laureen M Lopez; Kenneth F Schulz
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-08-01

Review 4.  Contraception in Canada: a review of method choices, characteristics, adherence and approaches to counselling.

Authors:  William A Fisher; Amanda Black
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-03-27       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 5.  Low-dose ethinylestradiol/levonorgestrel.

Authors:  Toni M Dando; Monique P Curran
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Nomegestrol acetate/17beta-estradiol does not negatively alter the vascular resistance of clitoral arteries: a prospective, exploratory study.

Authors:  Irene Scavello; Elisa Maseroli; Vincenza Di Stasi; Sarah Cipriani; Nunzia Verde; Angela Magini; Mario Maggi; Linda Vignozzi
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 2.896

Review 7.  The influence of oral contraceptives on athletic performance in female athletes.

Authors:  Melonie Burrows; Charlotte E Peters
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 8.  Hormonal contraception in adolescents: special considerations.

Authors:  Rollyn M Ornstein; Martin M Fisher
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.022

9.  Physiologic and psychologic symptoms associated with use of injectable contraception and 20 microg oral contraceptive pills.

Authors:  Abbey B Berenson; Susan D Odom; Carmen Radecki Breitkopf; Mahbubur Rahman
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-07-03       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 10.  Drospirenone/ethinylestradiol 3mg/20microg (24/4 day regimen): a review of its use in contraception, premenstrual dysphoric disorder and moderate acne vulgaris.

Authors:  Caroline Fenton; Keri Wellington; Marit D Moen; Dean M Robinson
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.