Literature DB >> 10715179

Social tactics of pigs in a competitive foraging task: the 'informed forager' paradigm.

.   

Abstract

Studies of the social dynamics in foraging groups have focused primarily on birds, rodents and nonhuman primates. We extended the study of animal social tactics to the domestic pig, Sus scrofa, by using an experimental analogue of natural foraging skills, the 'informed forager' paradigm. We investigated the behaviour of 16 pigs foraging in pairs in an arena in which food had been hidden in one of eight monopolizable buckets. Before each pair trial, one of the pigs, the 'informed' pig, was given privileged knowledge about the location of the food during a solitary search trial. The 'noninformed' pig was naïve about the location of the food during pair trials, but heavier than its informed partner and thus able to displace the latter from the baited bucket. By first focusing on the informed pigs' behaviour, we show that pigs are able to remember and relocate the food site. They found the food in relocation trials, using fewer bucket investigations than expected of a random searcher. Second, by focusing on the noninformed pigs, we show that pigs are able to exploit the knowledge of others by following them to a food source. They investigated more buckets immediately after their informed partners significantly more often than expected by chance and required fewer bucket investigations to find the food in pair trials than expected from a random searcher, but not in solitary search trials. We discuss these latter findings with reference to social foraging tactics. Copyright 2000 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.

Entities:  

Year:  2000        PMID: 10715179     DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1322

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Behav        ISSN: 0003-3472            Impact factor:   2.844


  15 in total

1.  Using cross correlations to investigate how chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) use conspecific gaze cues to extract and exploit information in a foraging competition.

Authors:  Katie Hall; Mike W Oram; Matthew W Campbell; Timothy M Eppley; Richard W Byrne; Frans B M De Waal
Journal:  Am J Primatol       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 2.371

Review 2.  Assessing learning and memory in pigs.

Authors:  Elise Titia Gieling; Rebecca Elizabeth Nordquist; Franz Josef van der Staay
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 3.084

Review 3.  Cognition and the human-animal relationship: a review of the sociocognitive skills of domestic mammals toward humans.

Authors:  Plotine Jardat; Léa Lansade
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2021-09-02       Impact factor: 2.899

4.  Post-weaning social and cognitive performance of piglets raised pre-weaning either in a complex multi-suckling group housing system or in a conventional system with a crated sow.

Authors:  S E van Nieuwamerongen; M Mendl; S Held; N M Soede; J E Bolhuis
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 3.084

5.  Importance of neonatal immunoglobulin transfer for hippocampal development and behaviour in the newborn pig.

Authors:  Kateryna Goncharova; Liudmyla Lozinska; Ester Arevalo Sureda; Jarosław Woliński; Björn Weström; Stefan Pierzynowski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Thinking chickens: a review of cognition, emotion, and behavior in the domestic chicken.

Authors:  Lori Marino
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2017-01-02       Impact factor: 3.084

7.  Ability of Laying Hens to Distinguish Between Companions According to Their Success in Gaining Access to Food.

Authors:  Anette Wichman
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2018-10-01

8.  Goats favour personal over social information in an experimental foraging task.

Authors:  Luigi Baciadonna; Alan G McElligott; Elodie F Briefer
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  Cognitive enrichment in piglet rearing: an approach to enhance animal welfare and to reduce aggressive behaviour.

Authors:  Lilia Thays Sonoda; Michaela Fels; Sally Rauterberg; Stefano Viazzi; Gunel Ismayilova; Maciej Oczak; Claudia Bahr; Marcella Guarino; Erik Vranken; Daniel Berckmans; Jörg Hartung
Journal:  ISRN Vet Sci       Date:  2013-10-01

Review 10.  In what sense are dogs special? Canine cognition in comparative context.

Authors:  Stephen E G Lea; Britta Osthaus
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.986

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.