Literature DB >> 10715175

Antipredator vigilance of juvenile and adult thirteen-lined ground squirrels and the role of nutritional need.

.   

Abstract

Juvenile thirteen-lined ground squirrels, Spermophilus tridecemlineatus, are less vigilant (i.e. they spend less time visually scanning the environment) than adults. To determine whether nutritional need was a potential cause of this difference, we supplemented two groups of free-ranging juveniles during the predispersal stage, while juveniles were still near and around the natal burrows. The high-energy food group (HEF: 11 squirrels) received peanut butter and oats while the low-energy food group (LEF: seven squirrels) received lettuce. Adults (14 squirrels) were also supplemented, but due to their greater home range sizes, it was not feasible to classify them as either HEF or LEF. To evaluate the effect of supplementation on antipredator vigilance, the behavioural act of visually scanning for predators, we videotaped individuals while they were foraging above ground during 5-min observation periods. Each squirrel was observed and weighed during three time periods over 23 days. From the videotape, we extracted measures of time spent vigilant, locomoting and foraging. All three categories of squirrels gained mass over the study period, but the HEF juveniles rapidly exceeded that of the LEF juveniles. Early in the study, LEF and HEF juveniles did not significantly differ in either body mass or time budgets, and, initially, both juvenile groups were similar to adults in the amount of time devoted to vigilance. Later in the study, the behaviour of HEF juveniles closely resembled that of adults (increased time devoted to vigilance and decreased time devoted to foraging), while LEF juveniles decreased vigilance and increased their foraging time. This study indicates that for thirteen-lined ground squirrels the lower vigilance of juveniles is due, at least in part, to the greater nutritional needs of young animals with consequent increases in foraging, which is largely incompatible with vigilance. Copyright 2000 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.

Entities:  

Year:  2000        PMID: 10715175     DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1345

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Behav        ISSN: 0003-3472            Impact factor:   2.844


  6 in total

1.  Age and sex influence marmot antipredator behavior during periods of heightened risk.

Authors:  Amanda J Lea; Daniel T Blumstein
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2011-03-11       Impact factor: 2.980

2.  Sex-related differences in the trade-off between foraging and vigilance in a granivorous forager.

Authors:  Thibaut Powolny; Vincent Bretagnolle; Astrid Aguilar; Cyril Eraud
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Human disturbances, habitat characteristics and social environment generate sex-specific responses in vigilance of Mediterranean mouflon.

Authors:  Stéphanie Benoist; Mathieu Garel; Jean-Marc Cugnasse; Pierrick Blanchard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Geographic variability in the alarm calls of the European ground squirrel.

Authors:  Irena Schneiderová; Lucie Štefanská; Lukáš Kratochvíl
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 2.624

5.  Vigilance and activity time-budget adjustments of wintering hooded cranes, Grus monacha, in human-dominated foraging habitats.

Authors:  Chunlin Li; Lizhi Zhou; Li Xu; Niannian Zhao; Guy Beauchamp
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Foraging, feeding, and physiological stress responses of wild wood mice to increased illumination and common genet cues.

Authors:  Álvaro Navarro-Castilla; Isabel Barja; Mario Díaz
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 2.624

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.