Literature DB >> 10715061

Hepatic parenchymal enhancement during triple-phase helical CT: can it be used to predict which patients with breast cancer will develop hepatic metastases?

D H Sheafor1, J S Killius, E K Paulson, D M DeLong, A M Foti, R C Nelson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of hepatic enhancement characteristics for identification of patients with breast cancer who are at risk for future hepatic metastases.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Triple-phase helical computed tomography (CT) was performed in 60 patients with known breast cancer without visible hepatic metastases. Peak hepatic attenuation and enhancement, and attenuation and enhancement at 25 and 30 seconds were obtained. Ratios of hepatic attenuation or enhancement at 25 and 30 seconds to peak hepatic attenuation or enhancement were calculated. A Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to compare patients with and those without subsequent hepatic metastases.
RESULTS: During a mean 18-month follow-up, 18 patients (30%) developed hepatic metastases. Decreases in peak hepatic attenuation and enhancement and increases in hepatic attenuation and enhancement ratios at 25 and 30 seconds were seen in patients who developed metastases compared with those who did not (P < .05). When corrected for chemotherapy interval, these differences were not statistically significant. Using a threshold value of 0.40 or more for the enhancement ratio at 30 seconds resulted in sensitivity of 28%, specificity of 92%, and accuracy of 55%.
CONCLUSION: Patients with breast cancer who develop subsequent hepatic metastases have higher relative hepatic arterial perfusion during triple-phase CT; however, after correction for chemotherapy interval, this difference was not statistically significant. Threshold values cannot be used reliably to identify patients who will develop metastases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10715061     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.214.3.r00mr36875

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  5 in total

1.  Quantitative contrast-enhanced computed tomography: is there a need for system calibration?

Authors:  Kenneth A Miles; Helen Young; Sandra L Chica; Peter D Esser
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-09-29       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Does the presence of distant and local malignancy alter parenchymal perfusion in apparently disease-free areas of the liver?

Authors:  Y Tsushima; M J Blomley; H Yokoyama; S Kusano; K Endo
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 3.  Non-invasive diagnostic imaging of colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  Pier Paolo Mainenti; Federica Romano; Laura Pizzuti; Sabrina Segreto; Giovanni Storto; Lorenzo Mannelli; Massimo Imbriaco; Luigi Camera; Simone Maurea
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2015-07-28

4.  Functional CT imaging in oncology.

Authors:  K A Miles
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  A Systematic Review on the Role of the Perfusion Computed Tomography in Abdominal Cancer.

Authors:  Nunzia Garbino; Valentina Brancato; Marco Salvatore; Carlo Cavaliere
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 2.658

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.