PURPOSE: To evaluate two experimental blood pool agents for potential use in equilibrium phase abdominal magnetic resonance (MR) angiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MR imaging at 0.5 T was performed in 37 rabbits before and after intravenous injection of a gadolinium-based blood pool contrast agent (SH L 643 A), superparamagnetic iron oxide blood pool agent (SH U 555 C), or gadopentetate dimeglumine. T1-weighted fast spoiled gradient-echo images from the renal arteries to below the iliac bifurcation were obtained. The aorta-to-tissue signal difference-to-noise ratio (SDNR) was measured over time. RESULTS: Both blood pool agents yielded excellent demonstration of the rabbit abdominal aorta. At a dose of 0.1 mmol/kg, both provided a statistically significant increase in aorta-to-tissue SDNR in comparison with that achieved with gadopentetate dimeglumine (200% increase for SH L 643 A, 95% increase for SH U 555 C; P < .05). A 0.1 mmol/kg dose of SH L 643 A provided a 24% increase in SDNR relative to the increase with a 0.37 mmol/kg dose of gadopentetate dimeglumine. Time-dependent enhancement properties of the blood pool agents differed due to differences in elimination method. CONCLUSION: Both blood pool agents were found to be promising contrast agents for 0.5-T MR angiography; however, their clinical applicability warrants further investigation. The gadolinium-based agent had several advantages over the iron oxide compound, including less T2* dephasing, lack of susceptibility artifacts, and fast renal elimination.
PURPOSE: To evaluate two experimental blood pool agents for potential use in equilibrium phase abdominal magnetic resonance (MR) angiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MR imaging at 0.5 T was performed in 37 rabbits before and after intravenous injection of a gadolinium-based blood pool contrast agent (SH L 643 A), superparamagnetic iron oxide blood pool agent (SH U 555 C), or gadopentetate dimeglumine. T1-weighted fast spoiled gradient-echo images from the renal arteries to below the iliac bifurcation were obtained. The aorta-to-tissue signal difference-to-noise ratio (SDNR) was measured over time. RESULTS: Both blood pool agents yielded excellent demonstration of the rabbit abdominal aorta. At a dose of 0.1 mmol/kg, both provided a statistically significant increase in aorta-to-tissue SDNR in comparison with that achieved with gadopentetate dimeglumine (200% increase for SH L 643 A, 95% increase for SH U 555 C; P < .05). A 0.1 mmol/kg dose of SH L 643 A provided a 24% increase in SDNR relative to the increase with a 0.37 mmol/kg dose of gadopentetate dimeglumine. Time-dependent enhancement properties of the blood pool agents differed due to differences in elimination method. CONCLUSION: Both blood pool agents were found to be promising contrast agents for 0.5-T MR angiography; however, their clinical applicability warrants further investigation. The gadolinium-based agent had several advantages over the iron oxide compound, including less T2* dephasing, lack of susceptibility artifacts, and fast renal elimination.
Authors: Stephan Metz; Ambros J Beer; Marcus Settles; Jaroslav Pelisek; René M Botnar; Ernst J Rummeny; Peter Heider Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2010-10-24 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Maryse Proulx; Kim Aubin; Jean Lagueux; Pierre Audet; Michèle Auger; Marc-André Fortin; Julie Fradette Journal: Tissue Eng Part C Methods Date: 2015-02-25 Impact factor: 3.056
Authors: Gregory A Christoforidis; Ming Yang; Marinos S Kontzialis; Douglas G Larson; Amir Abduljalil; Michelle Basso; Weilian Yang; Abhik Ray-Chaudhury; Johannes Heverhagen; Michael V Knopp; Rolf F Barth Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2009-07 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Stephan Metz; Gabriel Bonaterra; Martina Rudelius; Marcus Settles; Ernst J Rummeny; Heike E Daldrup-Link Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2004-07-13 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Grigorios Korosoglou; Saurabh Shah; Evert-Jan Vonken; Wesley D Gilson; Michael Schär; Lijun Tang; Dara L Kraitchman; Raymond C Boston; David E Sosnovik; Robert G Weiss; Ralph Weissleder; Matthias Stuber Journal: Radiology Date: 2008-09-09 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Bruno Marchand; Philippe C Douek; Philippe Robert; Claire Corot; Jean Pierre Roux; Patrice Adeleine; Marcela Hernandez-Hoyos; Yannick Cremillieux; Maciej Orkisz; Emmanuelle Canet Journal: MAGMA Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 2.533