Literature DB >> 10714777

High and low pressure pulsatile lavage of contaminated tibial fractures: an in vitro study of bacterial adherence and bone damage.

M Bhandari1, E H Schemitsch, A Adili, R J Lachowski, S G Shaughnessy.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to examine the effect of pulsatile irrigation on microscopic bone architecture and its time-dependent efficacy in removing adherent slime-producing bacteria from cortical bone.
DESIGN: Using an in vitro model, ten-millimeter transverse cut sections from five human tibiae were contaminated with Staphylococcus aureus and subjected to either high pressure pulsatile lavage (HPPL; seventy pounds per square inch, normal saline) or low pressure pulsatile lavage (LPPL; fourteen pounds per square inch, normal saline) or served as controls. Alteration of bony architecture was quantified by using a previously described ordinal scale and histomorphometric analysis of each transverse cut section of tibia. To assess the time-dependent effectiveness of pulsatile lavage in removing adherent bacteria from bone, ten-millimeter transverse cut sections from ten canine tibiae were contaminated with S. aureus and subjected to high or low pressure pulsatile lavage immediately or after one, three, or six hours. Scanning electron microscopy and bacterial cultures were used to assess the removal of adherent bacteria.
RESULTS: HPPL resulted in significantly greater macroscopic damage than was seen with LPPL or in controls (ANOVA, p < 0.001). Histomorphometry revealed that HPPL was associated with significantly larger and more numerous fissures or defects in the cortical bone when compared with low pressure irrigation (p < 0.001). However, high and low pressure lavage were associated with similar degrees of periosteal separation from the cortical bone surface (p = 0.87). Both high and low pressure lavage were effective in removing adherent bacteria from bone at three hours irrigation delay, but only high pressure lavage removed adherent bacteria from bone at six hours delay.
CONCLUSION: In this in vitro study, compared with HPPL, LPPL led to less structural damage and was equally effective in removing bacteria within three hours debridement delay; however, the efficacy of LPPL at six hours debridement delay is questionable. This finding may have clinical significance in the development of infection following open tibial fractures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10714777     DOI: 10.1097/00005131-199911000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0890-5339            Impact factor:   2.512


  17 in total

1.  Surgical site infection after pediatric spinal deformity surgery.

Authors:  Ying Li; Michael Glotzbecker; Daniel Hedequist
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2012-02-09

2.  Extremity and Orthopaedic Injuries.

Authors:  V K Sinha; S Anand
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2011-07-21

Review 3.  Management of open fractures.

Authors:  Robert Blease; Enes Kanlić
Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.363

4.  Initial management of complex hand injuries in military or austere environments: how to defer and prepare for definitive repair?

Authors:  Camille Choufani; Olivier Barbier; Antoine Grosset; James Charles Murison; Didier Ollat; Sylvain Rigal; Laurent Mathieu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Fluid lavage of open wounds (FLOW): design and rationale for a large, multicenter collaborative 2 x 3 factorial trial of irrigating pressures and solutions in patients with open fractures.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  A Guide to Improving the Care of Patients with Fragility Fractures, Edition 2.

Authors:  Simon C Mears; Stephen L Kates
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2015-06

Review 7.  Clinical Evidence of Current Irrigation Practices and the Use of Oral Antibiotics to Prevent and Treat Periprosthetic Joint Infection.

Authors:  Jason Zlotnicki; Alexandra Gabrielli; Kenneth L Urish; Kimberly M Brothers
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 2.472

Review 8.  Evidence-based treatment of open ankle fractures.

Authors:  Caroline C C Hulsker; Sanne Kleinveld; Chris B L Zonnenberg; Mike Hogervorst; Michel P J van den Bekerom
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 3.067

9.  Open tibial fractures: An overview.

Authors:  Marios Nicolaides; Georgios Pafitanis; Alexandros Vris
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-06-24

10.  Treatment principles in the management of open fractures.

Authors:  William W Cross; Marc F Swiontkowski
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.