Literature DB >> 10714460

Screening for infection of Trichinella in red fox (Vulpes vulpes) in Denmark.

H L Enemark1, H Bjørn, S A Henriksen, B Nielsen.   

Abstract

A total of 6141 foxes (Vulpes vulpes) were examined for infection with Trichinella. The foxes were killed in Denmark during the hunting season 1995-1996 and 1997-1998; 3133 and 3008, respectively. Foxes included in the investigation came from throughout the country with the exception of the island of Bornholm. The right foreleg from each fox was submitted for investigation. The legs were stored at -20 degrees C for 3-10 months prior to examination. Following thawing, muscle tissue (10 g) from each leg was examined by trichinoscopy and by a pepsin-HCl digestion technique. In 1995-1996, three foxes were found positive corresponding to a prevalence of 0.001. Each of the infected foxes harboured an extremely low infection, i.e. about one larva per 10 g muscle tissue. It was not possible to obtain sufficient larval material for species identification. All three foxes were shot in the vicinity of a small village in the north-western part of Denmark. In 1997-1998 no Trichinella cases were found. The results, compared with previous studies, indicate that the prevalence of infection of Trichinella sp. among wild living foxes in Denmark is very low. This is further supported by the fact, that no infection of Trichinella sp. has been found in slaughtered pigs in Denmark for more than 65 years, which suggests that the infection pressure is very low. Considering the facts above we conclude that the risk of Trichinella infections is negligible in intensive indoor pig production units in Denmark whereas high local prevalence of Trichinella infections in the wildlife might constitute a serious risk for the expanding outdoor pig production.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10714460     DOI: 10.1016/s0304-4017(99)00219-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Parasitol        ISSN: 0304-4017            Impact factor:   2.738


  7 in total

1.  Trichinella sp. in red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) from Catalonia, NE Spain.

Authors:  Jorge-Ramón López-Olvera; Laia Vives; Emmanuel Serrano; Laura Fernández-Sirera; Lluís Picart; Luca Rossi; Ignasi Marco; Esther Bigas; Santiago Lavín
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 2.289

2.  Predilection muscles and physical condition of raccoon dogs (Nyctereutes procyonoides) experimentally infected with Trichinella spiralis and Trichinella nativa.

Authors:  T Mikkonen; L Oivanen; A Näreaho; H Helin; A Sukura
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.695

3.  Trend analysis of Trichinella in a red fox population from a low endemic area using a validated artificial digestion and sequential sieving technique.

Authors:  Frits Franssen; Gunita Deksne; Zanda Esíte; Arie Havelaar; Arno Swart; Joke van der Giessen
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 3.683

4.  Occurrence of Trichinella spp. in wild animals in northwestern Libya.

Authors:  M M Hosni; A A El Maghrbi; K S Ganghish
Journal:  Open Vet J       Date:  2013-07-22

5.  Endoparasites of the raccoon dog (Nyctereutes procyonoides) and the red fox (Vulpes vulpes) in Denmark 2009-2012 - A comparative study.

Authors:  Mohammad Nafi Solaiman Al-Sabi; Mariann Chriél; Trine Hammer Jensen; Heidi Larsen Enemark
Journal:  Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 2.674

6.  Trichinella spp. biomass has increased in raccoon dogs (Nyctereutes procyonoides) and red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) in Estonia.

Authors:  Age Kärssin; Liidia Häkkinen; Enel Niin; Katrin Peik; Annika Vilem; Pikka Jokelainen; Brian Lassen
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2017-12-16       Impact factor: 3.876

7.  Predators in northern Germany are reservoirs for parasites of One Health concern.

Authors:  Patrick Waindok; Katharina Raue; Miguel L Grilo; Ursula Siebert; Christina Strube
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2021-02-06       Impact factor: 2.289

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.