Literature DB >> 10713889

Opposite deletions/duplications of the X chromosome: two novel reciprocal rearrangements.

S Giglio1, B Pirola, G Arrigo, P Dagrada, B Bardoni, F Bernardi, G Russo, L Argentiero, A Forabosco, R Carrozzo, O Zuffardi.   

Abstract

Paralogous sequences on the same chromosome allow refolding of the chromosome into itself and homologous recombination. Recombinant chromosomes have microscopic or submicroscopic rearrangements according to the distance between repeats. Examples are the submicroscopic inversions of factor VIII, of the IDS gene and of the FLN1/emerin region, all resulting from misalignment of inverted repeats, and double recombination. Most of these inversions are of paternal origin possibly because the X chromosome at male meiosis is free to refold into itself for most of its length. We report on two de novo rearrangements of the X chromosome found in four hypogonadic females. Two of them had an X chromosome deleted for most of Xp and duplicated for a portion of Xq and two had the opposite rearrangement (class I and class II rearrangements, respectively). The breakpoints were defined at the level of contiguous YACs. The same Xp 11.23 breakpoint was found in the four cases. That of the long arm coincided in three cases (Xq21.3) and was more proximal in case 4 (Xq21.1). Thus class I rearrangements (cases 1 and 2) are reciprocal to that of case 3, whilst that of case 4 shares only the Xp breakpoint. The abnormal X was paternal in the three cases investigated. Repeated inverted sequences located at the breakpoints of rearrangements are likely to favour the refolding of the paternal X chromosome and the recombination of the repeats. The repeat at the Xp11 may synapse with either that at Xq21.3 or that at Xq21.1. These rearrangements seem to originate as the Xq28 submicroscopic inversions but they are identifiable at the microscopic level and result from a single recombination event.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10713889     DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5200394

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet        ISSN: 1018-4813            Impact factor:   4.246


  5 in total

1.  Subterminal deletion/duplication event in an affected male due to maternal X chromosome pericentric inversion.

Authors:  Nadja Kokalj-Vokac; Natasa Marcun-Varda; Andreja Zagorac; Alenka Erjavec-Skerget; Boris Zagradisnik; Mirjana Todorovic; Alojz Gregoric
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2004-08-12       Impact factor: 3.183

2.  MECP2 Duplications in Symptomatic Females: Report on 3 Patients Showing the Broad Phenotypic Spectrum.

Authors:  Victoria San Antonio-Arce; María Fenollar-Cortés; Raluca Oancea Ionescu; Teresa DeSantos-Moreno; Jesús Gallego-Merlo; Francisco José Illana Cámara; María Carmen Cotarelo Pérez
Journal:  Child Neurol Open       Date:  2016-04-04

Review 3.  Distal Xq duplication and functional Xq disomy.

Authors:  Damien Sanlaville; Caroline Schluth-Bolard; Catherine Turleau
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 4.123

4.  Cytogenetic and molecular characterization of a recombinant X chromosome in a family with a severe neurologic phenotype and macular degeneration.

Authors:  Pamela Magini; Monica Poscente; Simona Ferrari; Manuela Vargiolu; Elena Bacchelli; Claudio Graziano; Anita Wischmeijer; Daniela Turchetti; Elisabetta Malaspina; Valentina Marchiani; Duccio Maria Cordelli; Emilio Franzoni; Giovanni Romeo; Marco Seri
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 2.009

5.  MECP2 duplication phenotype in symptomatic females: report of three further cases.

Authors:  Francesca Novara; Alessandro Simonati; Federico Sicca; Roberta Battini; Simona Fiori; Annarita Contaldo; Lucia Criscuolo; Orsetta Zuffardi; Roberto Ciccone
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 2.009

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.