Literature DB >> 10713198

Positioning of vagal nerve stimulators: technical note.

A Maniker1, W C Liu, D Marks, K Moser, A Kalnin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Vagal nerve stimulation has become an important treatment for patients with intractable seizure disorders. Many of these patients will require magnetic resonance imaging (MRIs) of the brain after the stimulator has been implanted to monitor underlying neurologic conditions. Functional MRI (fMRI) is also being used in the evaluation of epilepsy. With the current recommended implant techniques the magnetic field of the MRI will deactivate the pulse generator while the patient is in the supine position for the scan. A simple change in positioning of the pulse generator will help to avoid deactivating the device during an MRI. This will avoid exposing the patient to lengthy time periods with a deactivated stimulator and also allow for the performance of fMRIs and any other MRI scans needed to monitor underlying neurologic conditions.
METHODS: A working model of the NeuroCybernetic Prosthesis (NCP) pulse generator was assessed with an oscilloscope and LED light connected to it that related activation of the generator while in the MRI. This simulation was performed with the device alone, in multiple positions. Then patients with implanted devices who could personally confirm the activation of their stimulators were also studied.
RESULTS: A pulse generator placed with the electrode inputs parallel to the long axis of the body was not deactivated by the magnetic field of the MRI when the patient was in the supine position.
CONCLUSION: Changing the implant position of a vagal nerve stimulator pulse generator will help to prevent deactivation of the device while in the MRI, allowing for the performance of fMRIs while not exposing the patient to lengthy time periods with a deactivated vagal nerve stimulator.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10713198     DOI: 10.1016/s0090-3019(99)00176-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Neurol        ISSN: 0090-3019


  5 in total

1.  Efficacy of vagus nerve stimulation in brain tumor-associated intractable epilepsy and the importance of tumor stability.

Authors:  Kunal S Patel; Nelson Moussazadeh; Werner K Doyle; Douglas R Labar; Theodore H Schwartz
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 5.115

2.  Efficacy of vagus nerve stimulation as a treatment for medically intractable epilepsy in brain tumor patients. A case-controlled study using the VNS therapy Patient Outcome Registry.

Authors:  Kunal S Patel; Douglas R Labar; Charles M Gordon; Kevin H Hassnain; Theodore H Schwartz
Journal:  Seizure       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 3.184

Review 3.  Electrical stimulation for the treatment of epilepsy.

Authors:  Paul Boon; Robrecht Raedt; Veerle de Herdt; Tine Wyckhuys; Kristl Vonck
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 7.620

4.  Successful removal and reimplant of vagal nerve stimulator device after 10 years.

Authors:  Marco Giulioni; Matteo Martinoni; Ilaria Naldi; Francesca Bisulli; Eugenio Pozzati; Paolo Tinuper
Journal:  Ann Indian Acad Neurol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.383

5.  Use of Polyvinyl Alcohol Sponge Cubes for Vagal Nerve Stimulation: A Suggestion for the Wrapping Step. Technical Note and Step-by-Step Operative Technique.

Authors:  Hussein Hamdi; Giorgio Spatola; Stanislas Lagarde; Aileen McGonigal; Armando Paz-Paredes; Alain Bizeau; Fabrice Bartolomei; Romain Carron
Journal:  Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown)       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 2.703

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.