Literature DB >> 10713175

Cooperative signals governing ARF-mdm2 interaction and nucleolar localization of the complex.

J D Weber1, M L Kuo, B Bothner, E L DiGiammarino, R W Kriwacki, M F Roussel, C J Sherr.   

Abstract

The ARF tumor suppressor protein stabilizes p53 by antagonizing its negative regulator, Mdm2 (Hdm2 in humans). Both mouse p19(ARF) and human p14(ARF) bind to the central region of Mdm2 (residues 210 to 304), a segment that does not overlap with its N-terminal p53-binding domain, nuclear import or export signals, or C-terminal RING domain required for Mdm2 E3 ubiquitin ligase activity. The N-terminal 37 amino acids of mouse p19(ARF) are necessary and sufficient for binding to Mdm2, localization of Mdm2 to nucleoli, and p53-dependent cell cycle arrest. Although a nucleolar localization signal (NrLS) maps within a different segment (residues 82 to 101) of the human p14(ARF) protein, binding to Mdm2 and nucleolar import of ARF-Mdm2 complexes are both required for cell cycle arrest induced by either the mouse or human ARF proteins. Because many codons of mouse ARF mRNA are not recognized by the most abundant bacterial tRNAs, we synthesized ARF minigenes containing preferred bacterial codons. Using bacterially produced ARF polypeptides and chemically synthesized peptides conjugated to Sepharose, residues 1 to 14 and 26 to 37 of mouse p19(ARF) were found to interact independently and cooperatively with Mdm2, while residues 15 to 25 were dispensable for binding. Paradoxically, residues 26 to 37 of mouse p19(ARF) are also essential for ARF nucleolar localization in the absence of Mdm2. However, the mobilization of the p19(ARF)-Mdm2 complex into nucleoli also requires a cryptic NrLS within the Mdm2 C-terminal RING domain. The Mdm2 NrLS is unmasked upon ARF binding, and its deletion prevents import of the ARF-Mdm2 complex into nucleoli. Collectively, the results suggest that ARF binding to Mdm2 induces a conformational change that facilitates nucleolar import of the ARF-Mdm2 complex and p53-dependent cell cycle arrest. Hence, the ARF-Mdm2 interaction can be viewed as bidirectional, with each protein being capable of regulating the subnuclear localization of the other.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10713175      PMCID: PMC85460          DOI: 10.1128/MCB.20.7.2517-2528.2000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Biol        ISSN: 0270-7306            Impact factor:   4.272


  53 in total

1.  Identification of a cryptic nucleolar-localization signal in MDM2.

Authors:  M A Lohrum; M Ashcroft; M H Kubbutat; K H Vousden
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 28.824

2.  The mdm-2 oncogene product forms a complex with the p53 protein and inhibits p53-mediated transactivation.

Authors:  J Momand; G P Zambetti; D C Olson; D George; A J Levine
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1992-06-26       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Role of the INK4a locus in tumor suppression and cell mortality.

Authors:  M Serrano; H Lee; L Chin; C Cordon-Cardo; D Beach; R A DePinho
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1996-04-05       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Nuclear and nucleolar targeting of human ribosomal protein S6.

Authors:  C Schmidt; E Lipsius; J Kruppa
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.138

5.  The ribosomal L5 protein is associated with mdm-2 and mdm-2-p53 complexes.

Authors:  V Marechal; B Elenbaas; J Piette; J C Nicolas; A J Levine
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  Alternative reading frames of the INK4a tumor suppressor gene encode two unrelated proteins capable of inducing cell cycle arrest.

Authors:  D E Quelle; F Zindy; R A Ashmun; C J Sherr
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1995-12-15       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Tumor spectrum analysis in p53-mutant mice.

Authors:  T Jacks; L Remington; B O Williams; E M Schmitt; S Halachmi; R T Bronson; R A Weinberg
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1994-01-01       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  p53-deficient mice are extremely susceptible to radiation-induced tumorigenesis.

Authors:  C J Kemp; T Wheldon; A Balmain
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 38.330

9.  Interaction between the retinoblastoma protein and the oncoprotein MDM2.

Authors:  Z X Xiao; J Chen; A J Levine; N Modjtahedi; J Xing; W R Sellers; D M Livingston
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1995-06-22       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Stimulation of E2F1/DP1 transcriptional activity by MDM2 oncoprotein.

Authors:  K Martin; D Trouche; C Hagemeier; T S Sørensen; N B La Thangue; T Kouzarides
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1995-06-22       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  93 in total

Review 1.  Integration of the pRB and p53 cell cycle control pathways.

Authors:  C L Stewart; A M Soria; P A Hamel
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  RGS12TS-S localizes at nuclear matrix-associated subnuclear structures and represses transcription: structural requirements for subnuclear targeting and transcriptional repression.

Authors:  Tapan K Chatterjee; Rory A Fisher
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  Werner protein recruits DNA polymerase delta to the nucleolus.

Authors:  A M Szekely; Y H Chen; C Zhang; J Oshima; S M Weissman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-10-10       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Differential regulation of E2F1, DP1, and the E2F1/DP1 complex by ARF.

Authors:  Abhishek Datta; Alo Nag; Pradip Raychaudhuri
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  Turning the RING domain protein MdmX into an active ubiquitin-protein ligase.

Authors:  Saravanakumar Iyappan; Hans-Peter Wollscheid; Alejandro Rojas-Fernandez; Andreas Marquardt; Hao-Cheng Tang; Rajesh K Singh; Martin Scheffner
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-08-12       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Hypergrowth mTORC1 signals translationally activate the ARF tumor suppressor checkpoint.

Authors:  Alexander P Miceli; Anthony J Saporita; Jason D Weber
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 7.  The moving parts of the nucleolus.

Authors:  M O J Olson; Miroslav Dundr
Journal:  Histochem Cell Biol       Date:  2005-03-02       Impact factor: 4.304

8.  ARF directly binds DP1: interaction with DP1 coincides with the G1 arrest function of ARF.

Authors:  Abhishek Datta; Jayita Sen; Jussara Hagen; Chandrashekhar K Korgaonkar; Michael Caffrey; Dawn E Quelle; Douglas E Hughes; Timothy J Ackerson; Robert H Costa; Pradip Raychaudhuri
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.272

9.  ARF impedes NPM/B23 shuttling in an Mdm2-sensitive tumor suppressor pathway.

Authors:  Suzanne N Brady; Yue Yu; Leonard B Maggi; Jason D Weber
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.272

10.  Foxm1b transcription factor is essential for development of hepatocellular carcinomas and is negatively regulated by the p19ARF tumor suppressor.

Authors:  Vladimir V Kalinichenko; Michael L Major; Xinhe Wang; Vladimir Petrovic; Joseph Kuechle; Helena M Yoder; Margaret B Dennewitz; Brian Shin; Abhishek Datta; Pradip Raychaudhuri; Robert H Costa
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2004-04-01       Impact factor: 11.361

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.