Literature DB >> 10712996

Demonstration of in vivo bioequivalence of a generic albuterol metered-dose inhaler to Ventolin.

B A Stewart1, R C Ahrens, S Carrier, M Frosolono, C Lux, S H Han, G Milavetz.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To use histamine bronchoprovocation and bioassay statistical procedures to evaluate the in vivo bioequivalence of a generic albuterol metered-dose inhaler (MDI).
DESIGN: A randomized, double-blind, balanced, crossover design was used to determine the potency of each generic albuterol MDI actuation relative to Ventolin (Glaxo Wellcome; Research Triangle Park, NC) administration. One treatment was administered on each of 4 study days. A histamine bronchoprovocation procedure was initiated 1.25 h before and 15 min after administration of the study treatment. PATIENTS: Twenty-four nonsmoking subjects with mild-to-moderate asthma were studied (18 to 65 years of age; FEV(1), > 60% of predicted; and provocative concentration of histamine causing a 20% fall in FEV(1) [PC(20)], < or = 8 mg/mL at screening).
INTERVENTIONS: One and four actuations (90 and 360 microg, respectively) of the generic MDI and of Ventolin MDI. Placebo inhalers were used to maintain blinding of inhaler and doses. MEASUREMENTS AND
RESULTS: The primary outcome variable was histamine PC(20) measured after study treatment administration. A significant dose-effect relationship was present (p < 0.0001). Deviation from parallelism of the generic and Ventolin dose-response curves (p = 0.95) and differences in overall mean response between the two formulations (p = 0.68) were not significant. Using Finney 2 x 2 bioassay statistical procedures, we estimated that one actuation of the generic albuterol MDI was equivalent to 1.01 puffs of Ventolin (90% confidence interval, 0.69 to 1.50).
CONCLUSION: The generic albuterol MDI delivers a quantity of albuterol to the beta(2)-receptor site in the lung that is the bioequivalent to Ventolin. Further, this study reinforces the validity of this statistical methodology for determining in vivo bioequivalence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10712996     DOI: 10.1378/chest.117.3.714

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  5 in total

1.  Pharmacodynamic Studies to Demonstrate Bioequivalence of Oral Inhalation Products.

Authors:  Leslie Hendeles; Peter T Daley-Yates; Robert Hermann; Jan De Backer; Sanjeeva Dissanayake; Stephen T Horhota
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 4.009

2.  Methacholine challenge as a clinical bioassay of pulmonary delivery of a long-acting β₂-adrenergic agonist.

Authors:  Sreekala Prabhakaran; Jonathan Shuster; Richard Ahrens; Leslie Hendeles
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.705

3.  Speed of onset of bronchodilator response to salbutamol inhaled via different devices in asthmatics: a bioassay based on functional antagonism.

Authors:  Federico Lavorini; Pietro Geri; Laura Mariani; Cecilia Marmai; Nazzarena Maria Maluccio; Massimo Pistolesi; Giovanni A Fontana
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Effect of Study Design on Sample Size in Studies Intended to Evaluate Bioequivalence of Inhaled Short-Acting β-Agonist Formulations.

Authors:  Yaohui Zeng; Sachinkumar Singh; Kai Wang; Richard C Ahrens
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 3.126

5.  Method for evaluating the human bioequivalence of acarbose based on pharmacodynamic parameters.

Authors:  Su-Mei Xu; Yu-Ying Xu; Juan Yan; Yi-Fei Zhang; Dai Li; Dan Li; Xiao-Min Li; Jie Guo; Ping-Sheng Xu
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 1.671

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.