Literature DB >> 10712749

In vivo loss of heterozygosity in T-cells of B6C3F1 Aprt(+/-) mice.

L Liang1, L Deng, C Shao, P J Stambrook, J A Tischfield.   

Abstract

We have used B6C3F1 mice heterozygous at Aprt (adenine phosphoribosyltransferase) as a model to study in vivo loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in normal splenic T-lymphocytes. APRT-deficient T-cells were selected in medium containing 50 microg/ml 2, 6-diaminopurine (DAP), an adenine analog that is toxic only to cells with APRT enzyme activity. DAP-resistant (DAP(r)) T-cell variants were recovered at an average frequency of 3 x 10(-5) from 21 B6C3F1 Aprt(+/-) mice. Allele-specific PCR of Aprt showed that about 70% of 122 DAP(r) colonies were caused by loss of the nontargeted Aprt allele (Aprt(+)). Analysis of microsatellite markers along the length of chromosome 8 suggested that mitotic recombination, or chromosome loss, with or without duplication of the remaining chromosome are the predominant mechanisms resulting in loss of Aprt(+). DNA sequencing of Aprt RT-PCR products from the DAP(r) variants that retained Aprt(+) indicated that point mutation as well as other mechanisms could cause this second class of variants. The high spontaneous frequency of in vivo Aprt LOH in mouse T-cells, mediated by LOH mechanisms that are also known to produce human cancers, suggests that the Aprt heterozygous mouse is a valid model for studying the diversity of mechanisms for in vivo somatic mutagenesis. Copyright 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10712749

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen        ISSN: 0893-6692            Impact factor:   3.216


  8 in total

1.  X-rays induce distinct patterns of somatic mutation in fetal versus adult hematopoietic cells.

Authors:  Li Liang; Li Deng; Marc S Mendonca; Yanping Chen; Betty Zheng; Peter J Stambrook; Changshun Shao; Jay A Tischfield
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2007-06-05

2.  Genome dynamics in aging mice.

Authors:  Martijn E T Dollé; Jan Vijg
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 3.  Cancer Immunotherapy: Whence and Whither.

Authors:  Peter J Stambrook; John Maher; Farzin Farzaneh
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 5.852

4.  Embryonic stem cells and somatic cells differ in mutation frequency and type.

Authors:  Rachel B Cervantes; James R Stringer; Changshun Shao; Jay A Tischfield; Peter J Stambrook
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-03-12       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Role of the mismatch repair gene, Msh6, in suppressing genome instability and radiation-induced mutations.

Authors:  Julio Barrera-Oro; Tzu-Yang Liu; Erin Gorden; Raju Kucherlapati; Changshun Shao; Jay A Tischfield
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2008-04-30       Impact factor: 2.433

6.  Interchromosomal crossover in human cells is associated with long gene conversion tracts.

Authors:  Efrem A H Neuwirth; Masamitsu Honma; Andrew J Grosovsky
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2007-05-21       Impact factor: 4.272

7.  Mutagenesis in vivo in T cells of p21-deficient mice.

Authors:  Changshun Shao; Li Liang; Xin Zhao; Yanping Chen; Betty Zheng; Jianmin Chen; Minjie Luo; Jay A Tischfield
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2009-09-08       Impact factor: 2.433

8.  Rosa26-GFP direct repeat (RaDR-GFP) mice reveal tissue- and age-dependence of homologous recombination in mammals in vivo.

Authors:  Michelle R Sukup-Jackson; Orsolya Kiraly; Jennifer E Kay; Li Na; Elizabeth A Rowland; Kelly E Winther; Danielle N Chow; Takafumi Kimoto; Tetsuya Matsuguchi; Vidya S Jonnalagadda; Vilena I Maklakova; Vijay R Singh; Dushan N Wadduwage; Jagath Rajapakse; Peter T C So; Lara S Collier; Bevin P Engelward
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 5.917

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.