Literature DB >> 10712318

Treatment of gram-positive nosocomial pneumonia. Prospective randomized comparison of quinupristin/dalfopristin versus vancomycin. Nosocomial Pneumonia Group.

J Fagon1, H Patrick, D W Haas, A Torres, C Gibert, W G Cheadle, R E Falcone, J D Anholm, F Paganin, T C Fabian, F Lilienthal.   

Abstract

Nosocomial pneumonia is a frequent complication in hospitalized patients. Gram-positive pathogens, particularly Staphylococcus aureus, are responsible for the increasing frequency of nosocomial pneumonia. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravenous quinupristin/dalfopristin (Synercid) in the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia caused by gram-positive pathogens we conducted a prospective, randomized, open-label, international, multicenter, comparative clinical trial. Two hundred ninety-eight patients with nosocomial pneumonia were enrolled in 74 active centers in five countries: a subgroup of 171 (87 quinupristin/dalfopristin-treated and 84 vancomycin-treated patients) were evaluable for the major efficacy end points. One hundred fifty received 7.5 mg/kg of quinupristin/dalfopristin every 8 h; 148 patients received 1 g of vancomycin every 12 h. Aztreonam at a dose of 2 g every 8 h could be administered in both groups for coverage of gram-negative organisms, and tobramycin was added for coverage against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The primary efficacy end point was the clinical response between the seventh and the thirteenth day after the end of treatment in clinically evaluable patients with documented causative pathogen(s) at baseline (bacteriologically evaluable population). Therapy was clinically successful (cure or improvement) in 49 (56.3%) of patients receiving quinupristin/dalfopristin and 49 (58.3%) patients receiving vancomycin (difference, -2.0% [95% CI, -16.8% to 12.8%]) in the bacteriologically evaluable population. Equivalent clinical success rates were also observed in the all-treated population (n = 298), and in the bacteriologically evaluable patients intubated in baseline (39/72 [54%] compared with 36/67 [54%]). The by-pathogen bacteriologic response was similar in both treatment groups, with equivalent clinical success rates for Streptococcus pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Adverse events (venous and nonvenous) were equally distributed between groups; 15.3% of quinupristin/dalfopristin patients and 9.5% of vancomycin patients discontinued therapy because of an adverse clinical event. In this study quinupristin/dalfopristin was shown to be equivalent to vancomycin in the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia caused by gram-positive pathogens. Quinupristin/dalfopristin merits further evaluation for the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia caused by methicillin-resistant S. aureus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10712318     DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm.161.3.9904115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med        ISSN: 1073-449X            Impact factor:   21.405


  29 in total

Review 1.  Quinupristin/dalfopristin: a review of its use in the management of serious gram-positive infections.

Authors:  H M Lamb; D P Figgitt; D Faulds
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Linezolid in VAP by MRSA: a better choice?

Authors:  Malina Ioanas; Hartmut Lode
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-02-06       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 3.  Vancomycin-induced nephrotoxicity: mechanism, incidence, risk factors and special populations. A literature review.

Authors:  Sepideh Elyasi; Hossein Khalili; Simin Dashti-Khavidaki; Amirhooshang Mohammadpour
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 2.953

4.  Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of vancomycin for the treatment of patients with gram-positive infections: focus on the study design.

Authors:  Konstantinos Z Vardakas; Michael N Mavros; Nikolaos Roussos; Matthew E Falagas
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 5.  MRSA: treating people with infection.

Authors:  Nikolas Rae; Anna Jarchow-MacDonald; Dilip Nathwani; Charis Ann Marwick
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2016-02-16

6.  Is linezolid superior to vancomycin for complicated skin and soft tissue infections due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus?

Authors:  Andre C Kalil; Susan Puumala; Julie Stoner
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Should the currently recommended twice-daily dosing still be considered the most appropriate regimen for treating MRSA ventilator-associated pneumonia with vancomycin?

Authors:  Federico Pea; Pierluigi Viale
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 8.  Antibiotic management of ventilator-associated pneumonia due to antibiotic-resistant gram-positive bacterial infection.

Authors:  M H Kollef
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 9.  MRSA: treating people with infection.

Authors:  Dilip Nathwani; Peter Garnet Davey; Charis Ann Marwick
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2010-10-28

10.  The management of infection and colonization due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: A CIDS/CAMM position paper.

Authors:  Andrew E Simor; Mark Loeb
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis       Date:  2004-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.