Literature DB >> 10712229

The transmission/disequilibrium test and parental-genotype reconstruction for X-chromosomal markers.

S Horvath1, N M Laird, M Knapp.   

Abstract

Family-based association methods have recently been introduced that allow testing for linkage in the presence of linkage disequilibrium between a marker and a disease even if there is only incomplete parental-marker information. No such tests are currently available for X-linked markers. This report fills this methodological gap by presenting the X-linked sibling transmission/disequilibrium test (XS-TDT) and the X-linked reconstruction-combination transmission/disequilibrium test (XRC-TDT). As do their autosomal counterparts (S-TDT and RC-TDT), these tests make no assumption about the mode of inheritance of the disease and the ascertainment of the sample. They protect against spurious association due to population stratification. The two tests were compared by simulations, which show that (1) the X-linked RC-TDT is, in general, considerably more powerful than the X-linked S-TDT and (2) the lack of parental-genotype information can be offset by the typing of a sufficient number of sibling controls. A freely available SAS implementation of these tests allows the calculation of exact P values.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10712229      PMCID: PMC1288153          DOI: 10.1086/302823

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Genet        ISSN: 0002-9297            Impact factor:   11.025


  13 in total

1.  Refined linkage disequilibrium and physical mapping of the gene locus for X-linked dystonia-parkinsonism (DYT3).

Authors:  A H Németh; D Nolte; E Dunne; S Niemann; M Kostrzewa; U Peters; E Fraser; E Bochukova; R Butler; J Brown; R D Cox; E R Levy; H H Ropers; A P Monaco; U Müller
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  1999-09-15       Impact factor: 5.736

2.  Using exact P values to compare the power between the reconstruction-combined transmission/disequilibrium test and the sib transmission/disequilibrium test.

Authors:  M Knapp
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  A unified approach to adjusting association tests for population admixture with arbitrary pedigree structure and arbitrary missing marker information.

Authors:  D Rabinowitz; N Laird
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2000 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 0.444

4.  The transmission/disequilibrium test and parental-genotype reconstruction: the reconstruction-combined transmission/ disequilibrium test.

Authors:  M Knapp
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Use of parents, sibs, and unrelated controls for detection of associations between genetic markers and disease.

Authors:  D J Schaid; C Rowland
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  A sibship test for linkage in the presence of association: the sib transmission/disequilibrium test.

Authors:  R S Spielman; W J Ewens
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Use of siblings as controls in case-control association studies.

Authors:  D Curtis
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 1.670

8.  A discordant-sibship test for disequilibrium and linkage: no need for parental data.

Authors:  S Horvath; N M Laird
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  Mutation of the androgen-receptor gene in metastatic androgen-independent prostate cancer.

Authors:  M E Taplin; G J Bubley; T D Shuster; M E Frantz; A E Spooner; G K Ogata; H N Keer; S P Balk
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1995-05-25       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Transmission test for linkage disequilibrium: the insulin gene region and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM).

Authors:  R S Spielman; R E McGinnis; W J Ewens
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 11.025

View more
  20 in total

1.  Identification of a novel germline missense mutation of the androgen receptor in African American men with familial prostate cancer.

Authors:  Si-Yi Hu; Tao Liu; Zhen-Zhen Liu; Elisa Ledet; Cruz Velasco-Gonzalez; Diptasri M Mandal; Shahriar Koochekpour
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 3.285

2.  Identification of an X-chromosomal locus and haplotype modulating the phenotype of a mitochondrial DNA disorder.

Authors:  Gavin Hudson; Sharon Keers; Patrick Yu-Wai-Man; Philip Griffiths; Kirsi Huoponen; Marja-Liisa Savontaus; Eeva Nikoskelainen; Massimo Zeviani; Franco Carrara; Rita Horvath; Veronika Karcagi; Liesbeth Spruijt; I F M de Coo; Hubert J M Smeets; Patrick F Chinnery
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2005-10-11       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Monte Carlo pedigree disequilibrium test for markers on the X chromosome.

Authors:  Jie Ding; Shili Lin; Yang Liu
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Association test for X-linked QTL in family-based designs.

Authors:  Li Zhang; Eden R Martin; Richard W Morris; Yi-Ju Li
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-04-02       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 5.  Review and evaluation of methods correcting for population stratification with a focus on underlying statistical principles.

Authors:  Hemant K Tiwari; Jill Barnholtz-Sloan; Nathan Wineinger; Miguel A Padilla; Laura K Vaughan; David B Allison
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2008-03-31       Impact factor: 0.444

6.  Heterogenous effect of androgen receptor CAG tract length on testicular germ cell tumor risk: shorter repeats associated with seminoma but not other histologic types.

Authors:  Carol A Davis-Dao; Kimberly D Siegmund; David J Vandenberg; Eila C Skinner; Gerhard A Coetzee; Duncan C Thomas; Malcolm C Pike; Victoria K Cortessis
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 4.944

7.  X-APL: an improved family-based test of association in the presence of linkage for the X chromosome.

Authors:  Ren-Hua Chung; Richard W Morris; Li Zhang; Yi-Ju Li; Eden R Martin
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  The evolutionarily conserved G protein-coupled receptor SREB2/GPR85 influences brain size, behavior, and vulnerability to schizophrenia.

Authors:  Mitsuyuki Matsumoto; Richard E Straub; Stefano Marenco; Kristin K Nicodemus; Shun-Ichiro Matsumoto; Akihiko Fujikawa; Sosuke Miyoshi; Miwako Shobo; Shinji Takahashi; Junko Yarimizu; Masatoshi Yuri; Masashi Hiramoto; Shuji Morita; Hiroyuki Yokota; Takeshi Sasayama; Kazuhiro Terai; Masayasu Yoshino; Akira Miyake; Joseph H Callicott; Michael F Egan; Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg; Lucas Kempf; Robyn Honea; Radha Krishna Vakkalanka; Jun Takasaki; Masazumi Kamohara; Takatoshi Soga; Hideki Hiyama; Hiroyuki Ishii; Ayako Matsuo; Shintaro Nishimura; Nobuya Matsuoka; Masato Kobori; Hitoshi Matsushime; Masao Katoh; Kiyoshi Furuichi; Daniel R Weinberger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-04-14       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  The impact of COMT, BDNF and 5-HTT brain-genes on the development of anorexia nervosa: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sirine Abou Al Hassan; Darren Cutinha; Lama Mattar
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 4.652

10.  Sex chromosomes and genetic association studies.

Authors:  David G Clayton
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 11.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.