BACKGROUND: Mucogingival interceptive therapy in patients with buccally erupting teeth is performed to prevent the ectopic permanent tooth from developing periodontal lesions. The keratinized tissue entrapped between the erupting tooth and the deciduous tooth is retained to maintain a satisfactory width of the gingiva for the permanent tooth. The aim of the present study on buccally-erupted premolars scheduled for orthodontics was to evaluate the keratinized tissue width 3 months, 2 years, and 7 years subsequent to mucogingival interceptive therapy and orthodontic treatment. METHODS: Twenty-nine patients participated. Three different surgical techniques were used according to specific indications. Eight patients were treated with double pedicle flaps (DPF), 10 patients with apically positioned flaps (APF), and 11 with free gingival grafts (FGG). RESULTS: The amount of keratinized tissue on the treated (test) sites was not significantly less than on the control (untreated) sites showing normally erupting premolars at all observation periods. All 3 surgical procedures appeared to be effective in saving the keratinized tissue for the permanent tooth. Preoperative periodontal parameters such as gingival width, probing depth, and bleeding on probing significantly influenced the outcome 3 months after surgery (P <0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Mucogingival interceptive surgery is an effective approach to conserve the keratinized buccal gingiva of ectopically erupting premolars.
BACKGROUND: Mucogingival interceptive therapy in patients with buccally erupting teeth is performed to prevent the ectopic permanent tooth from developing periodontal lesions. The keratinized tissue entrapped between the erupting tooth and the deciduous tooth is retained to maintain a satisfactory width of the gingiva for the permanent tooth. The aim of the present study on buccally-erupted premolars scheduled for orthodontics was to evaluate the keratinized tissue width 3 months, 2 years, and 7 years subsequent to mucogingival interceptive therapy and orthodontic treatment. METHODS: Twenty-nine patients participated. Three different surgical techniques were used according to specific indications. Eight patients were treated with double pedicle flaps (DPF), 10 patients with apically positioned flaps (APF), and 11 with free gingival grafts (FGG). RESULTS: The amount of keratinized tissue on the treated (test) sites was not significantly less than on the control (untreated) sites showing normally erupting premolars at all observation periods. All 3 surgical procedures appeared to be effective in saving the keratinized tissue for the permanent tooth. Preoperative periodontal parameters such as gingival width, probing depth, and bleeding on probing significantly influenced the outcome 3 months after surgery (P <0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Mucogingival interceptive surgery is an effective approach to conserve the keratinized buccal gingiva of ectopically erupting premolars.