Literature DB >> 10711398

Comparison of human and rodent lung dosimetry models for particle clearance and retention.

E D Kuempel1.   

Abstract

Interspecies differences in the kinetics and/or mechanisms of particle retention can influence the amount and location of particle retention in the lungs, which can also influence the tissue response to a given particle burden. Dosimetric models may be used to adjust for differences in the exposure-dose relationships in different species, thus allowing for comparison of lung responses at equivalent doses. Although the rat is one of the most frequently used animal models for assessing the risk of exposures to hazardous substances in humans, few data are available for comparison of human and animal responses to inhaled particles. A biologically-based human dosimetric lung model was developed to describe the fate of respirable particles in the lungs of humans, using data from U.S. coal miners and assumptions about the overloading of alveolar clearance from studies in rats. This model includes alveolar, interstitial, and hilar lymph node compartments. The form of the model that provides the best fit to the lung dust burden data in these coal miners includes a first-order interstitialization process and either no dose-dependent decline in alveolar clearance or much less decline than expected from rodent studies. These findings are consistent with the particle retention patterns observed previously in the lungs of primates. This human lung dosimetry model is useful for investigating the factors that may influence the relationships between the airborne particle exposure, lung dust burden, and fibrotic lung disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10711398     DOI: 10.1081/dct-100100111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Chem Toxicol        ISSN: 0148-0545            Impact factor:   3.356


  3 in total

1.  Application of Markov chain Monte Carlo analysis to biomathematical modeling of respirable dust in US and UK coal miners.

Authors:  Lisa M Sweeney; Ann Parker; Lynne T Haber; C Lang Tran; Eileen D Kuempel
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 3.271

2.  Silicosis exposure-response in a cohort of tin miners comparing alternate exposure metrics.

Authors:  Robert M Park; Weihong Chen
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 2.214

3.  Human and animal evidence supports lower occupational exposure limits for poorly-soluble respirable particles: Letter to the Editor re: 'Low-toxicity dusts: Current exposure guidelines are not sufficiently protective' by Cherrie, Brosseau, Hay and Donaldson.

Authors:  Eileen D Kuempel; Michael D Attfield; Leslie T Stayner; Vincent Castranova
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2014-09-05
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.