Literature DB >> 10711328

Osteoplastic flap versus modified endoscopic Lothrop procedure in patients with frontal sinus disease.

S O Ulualp1, T K Carlson, R J Toohill.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to review the clinical results of osteoplastic flap procedure with abdominal fat obliteration and modified endoscopic Lothrop procedure. Charts of patients with frontal sinus disease who underwent osteoplastic flap procedure with abdominal fat obliteration or modified endoscopic Lothrop procedure were retrospectively reviewed. Forty-three patients with frontal sinus disease underwent osteoplastic flap procedure with abdominal fat obliteration. Frontal sinus disease was chronic sinusitis in 21, mucocele in 18, and papilloma in four. None of the patients had recurrence within 3 to 12 years follow-up period. Six patients had decreased forehead sensation, one had a CSF leak, and one had loss of the fat graft. Fifteen patients with chronic frontal sinusitis underwent modified endoscopic Lothrop procedure. The follow-up period ranged from 0.5 to 2.5 years. Two patients had recurrence of disease 2 and 6 months after surgery and required osteoplastic flap. In patients with chronic frontal sinusitis, both procedures achieved good relief of symptoms; however, follow-up time of modified endoscopic Lothrop procedure was smaller than that of osteoplastic flap procedure. In conclusion, osteoplastic flap procedure with abdominal fat obliteration provides successful treatment in patients with frontal chronic sinusitis, mucocele, or papilloma. Modified endoscopic Lothrop procedure achieves the relief of symptoms in patients with chronic frontal sinusitis. With the future availability of long term follow-up results, modified endoscopic Lothrop procedure may reduce the number of osteoplastic flap procedures in patients with chronic frontal sinusitis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10711328     DOI: 10.2500/105065800781602939

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Rhinol        ISSN: 1050-6586


  6 in total

1.  Selecting the best approach to the frontal sinus.

Authors:  Carl M Philpott; David C McKiernan; Amin R Javer
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-01-20

Review 2.  [Endonasal frontal sinus surgery. Part 2: Frontal sinus drainage type III (median drainage), tips and tricks, postoperative care].

Authors:  R Weber
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  Frontal sinus obliteration with autologous calvarial bone graft: indications and results.

Authors:  Pierre Vironneau; André Coste; Virginie Prulière-Escabasse
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-03-08       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 4.  Outcomes After Frontal Sinus Surgery: An Evidence-Based Review.

Authors:  Adam S DeConde; Timothy L Smith
Journal:  Otolaryngol Clin North Am       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.346

5.  Giant frontal mucocele occurring 32 years after frontal bone fracture: a case report.

Authors:  Yuuta Kamoshima; Shunsuke Terasaka; Yuji Nakamaru; Dai Takagi; Satoshi Fukuda; Kiyohiro Houkin
Journal:  Case Rep Neurol       Date:  2012-01-25

Review 6.  Secondary Reconstruction of Frontal Sinus Fracture.

Authors:  Yang Woo Kim; Dong Hun Lee; Young Woo Cheon
Journal:  Arch Craniofac Surg       Date:  2016-09-23
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.