J A Fain1, A Nettles2, M M Funnell3, D Charron4. 1. The University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Graduate School of Nursing, Worcester (Dr Fain) 2. Ms Nettles was chair of the 1999 Research Summit Planning Committee and is a healthcare consultant in Wayzata, Minnesota. 3. University of Michigan DRTC, Ann Arbor (Ms Funnell) 4. University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing, Health Promotion and Development, Pennsylvania (Dr Charron Prochownik)
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to summarize the accumulated state of knowledge in the area of diabetes patient education research and highlight important issues that research has left unanswered. METHODS: An integrative literature review was conducted on the topic of diabetes patient education between the years 1985 and 1998. Keywords used in the computerized search were diabetes mellitus, patient education, health education, research, and behavior change. The databases searched were MEDLINE, CINAHL, HealthSTAR, EMBASE, and CHID-HE. A total of 78 papers were reviewed. RESULTS: Most studies lacked a theoretical framework and the majority of studies were conducted in an outpatient setting. HbA1c was the most frequently employed outcome measure, with little, if any, description of the interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Much has been learned in terms of the effectiveness of diabetes education on improving knowledge. However, other topic areas and outcomes need further exploration.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to summarize the accumulated state of knowledge in the area of diabetespatient education research and highlight important issues that research has left unanswered. METHODS: An integrative literature review was conducted on the topic of diabetespatient education between the years 1985 and 1998. Keywords used in the computerized search were diabetes mellitus, patient education, health education, research, and behavior change. The databases searched were MEDLINE, CINAHL, HealthSTAR, EMBASE, and CHID-HE. A total of 78 papers were reviewed. RESULTS: Most studies lacked a theoretical framework and the majority of studies were conducted in an outpatient setting. HbA1c was the most frequently employed outcome measure, with little, if any, description of the interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Much has been learned in terms of the effectiveness of diabetes education on improving knowledge. However, other topic areas and outcomes need further exploration.
Authors: Ronald C Plotnikoff; Kerry S Courneya; Ronald J Sigal; Jeffrey A Johnson; Nicholas Birkett; David Lau; Kim Raine; Steven T Johnson; Nandini Karunamuni Journal: Trials Date: 2010-01-12 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Domingo Orozco-Beltrán; Manel Mata-Cases; Sara Artola; Pedro Conthe; Javier Mediavilla; Carlos Miranda Journal: Aten Primaria Date: 2016-01-13 Impact factor: 1.137