Literature DB >> 10710577

Using thresholds based on risk of cardiovascular disease to target treatment for hypertension: modelling events averted and number treated.

S Baker1, P Priest, R Jackson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the impact of using thresholds based on absolute risk of cardiovascular disease to target drug treatment to lower blood pressure in the community.
DESIGN: Modelling of three thresholds of treatment for hypertension based on the absolute risk of cardiovascular disease. 5 year risk of disease was estimated for each participant using an equation to predict risk. Net predicted impact of the thresholds on the number of people treated and the number of disease events averted over 5 years was calculated assuming a relative treatment benefit of one quarter.
SETTING: Auckland, New Zealand. PARTICIPANTS: 2158 men and women aged 35-79 years randomly sampled from the general electoral rolls. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Predicted 5 year risk of cardiovascular disease event, estimated number of people for whom treatment would be recommended, and disease events averted over 5 years at different treatment thresholds.
RESULTS: 46 374 (12%) Auckland residents aged 35-79 receive drug treatment to lower their blood pressure, averting an estimated 1689 disease events over 5 years. Restricting treatment to individuals with blood pressure >/=170/100 mm Hg and those with blood pressure between 150/90-169/99 mm Hg who have a predicted 5 year risk of disease >/=10% would increase the net number for whom treatment would be recommended by 19 401. This 42% relative increase is predicted to avert 1139/1689 (68%) additional disease events overall over 5 years compared with current treatment. If the threshold for 5 year risk of disease is set at 15% the number recommended for treatment increases by <10% but about 620/1689 (37%) additional events can be averted. A 20% threshold decreases the net number of patients recommended for treatment by about 10% but averts 204/1689 (12%) more disease events than current treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: Implementing treatment guidelines that use treatment thresholds based on absolute risk could significantly improve the efficiency of drug treatment to lower blood pressure in primary care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10710577      PMCID: PMC27311          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.320.7236.680

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  23 in total

1.  Joint British recommendations on prevention of coronary heart disease in clinical practice. British Cardiac Society, British Hyperlipidaemia Association, British Hypertension Society, endorsed by the British Diabetic Association.

Authors: 
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Is the Framingham risk function valid for northern European populations? A comparison of methods for estimating absolute coronary risk in high risk men.

Authors:  I U Haq; L E Ramsay; W W Yeo; P R Jackson; E J Wallis
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Antihypertensive drugs in very old people: a subgroup meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. INDANA Group.

Authors:  F Gueyffier; C Bulpitt; J P Boissel; E Schron; T Ekbom; R Fagard; E Casiglia; K Kerlikowske; J Coope
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-03-06       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Representativeness of the Framingham risk model for coronary heart disease mortality: a comparison with a national cohort study.

Authors:  P E Leaverton; P D Sorlie; J C Kleinman; A L Dannenberg; L Ingster-Moore; W B Kannel; J C Cornoni-Huntley
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

5.  Guidelines for detection and management of dyslipidaemia. Scientific Committee of the National Heart Foundation of New Zealand.

Authors:  J I Mann; M Crooke; H Fear; D R Hay; R T Jackson; J M Neutze; H D White
Journal:  N Z Med J       Date:  1993-04-14

6.  British Hypertension Society guidelines for hypertension management 1999: summary.

Authors:  L E Ramsay; B Williams; G D Johnston; G A MacGregor; L Poston; J F Potter; N R Poulter; G Russell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-09-04

7.  Multivariate prediction of coronary heart disease in the Western Collaborative Group Study compared to the findings of the Framingham study.

Authors:  R J Brand; R H Rosenman; R I Sholtz; M Friedman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1976-02       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Cholesterol determination in high-density lipoproteins separated by three different methods.

Authors:  M F Lopes-Virella; P Stone; S Ellis; J A Colwell
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 8.327

9.  Management of raised blood pressure in New Zealand: a discussion document.

Authors:  R Jackson; P Barham; J Bills; T Birch; L McLennan; S MacMahon; T Maling
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-07-10

10.  Cardiovascular disease risk profiles.

Authors:  K M Anderson; P M Odell; P W Wilson; W B Kannel
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 4.749

View more
  17 in total

1.  Risk in cardiovascular disease. Merit of using risk reduction rather than absolute risk for lipid lowering drugs.

Authors:  R Neary; S Ramachandran
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-07-15

2.  Guidelines on preventing cardiovascular disease in clinical practice.

Authors:  R Jackson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-03-11

3.  Drugs for preventing cardiovascular disease in China.

Authors:  Jin Ling Tang; Yong Hua Hu
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-03-19

4.  Using disease risk estimates to guide risk factor interventions: field test of a patient workbook for self-assessing coronary risk.

Authors:  J Michael Paterson; Hilary A Llewellyn-Thomas; C David Naylor
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  The Framingham Heart Study's impact on global risk assessment.

Authors:  Asaf Bitton; Thomas A Gaziano
Journal:  Prog Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 8.194

6.  Meeting the National Service Framework for coronary heart disease: which patients have untreated high blood pressure?

Authors:  T Marshall; A Rouse
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 7.  Benefits of treating hypertension in the elderly: should age affect treatment decisions?

Authors:  J Duggan
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.923

8.  Statin use in Canadians: trends, determinants and persistence.

Authors:  C Ineke Neutel; Howard Morrison; Norm R C Campbell; Margaret de Groh
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct

9.  Polypill therapy, subclinical atherosclerosis, and cardiovascular events-implications for the use of preventive pharmacotherapy: MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis).

Authors:  Márcio Sommer Bittencourt; Michael J Blaha; Ron Blankstein; Matthew Budoff; Jose D Vargas; Roger S Blumenthal; Arthur S Agatston; Khurram Nasir
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  2019 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Donna K Arnett; Roger S Blumenthal; Michelle A Albert; Andrew B Buroker; Zachary D Goldberger; Ellen J Hahn; Cheryl Dennison Himmelfarb; Amit Khera; Donald Lloyd-Jones; J William McEvoy; Erin D Michos; Michael D Miedema; Daniel Muñoz; Sidney C Smith; Salim S Virani; Kim A Williams; Joseph Yeboah; Boback Ziaeian
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2019-03-17       Impact factor: 24.094

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.