Literature DB >> 10710263

Growth disturbances after distal tibial physeal fractures.

L Berson1, R S Davidson, J P Dormans, D S Drummond, J R Gregg.   

Abstract

Twenty-four patients with distal tibial growth disturbance were reviewed. Disturbances were classified as physeal bar (prior to deformity), angular, linear or combined deformities. Treatment consisted of osteotomy in fourteen, epiphyseodesis in seven, excision of bony bar in two, and observation in one patient. Follow up was an average 36.6 months (range 4-129 months) after treatment of growth disturbance. The age at time of injury was 10.4 years of age average (range 3-15 years). There were 12 SH2, 2 SH3, 7 SH4, and 3 SH5 distal tibial physeal fractures. Thirteen of 15 fractures considered high energy and only 1 of 9 fractures considered low energy resulted in angular deformity. Angular and linear deformities presented an average 46 months (range 12-120 months) and physeal bars at an average 14 months (range 6-25 months) after injury. Patients with a delay in presentation of growth disturbance greater than 24 months had angular deformities in 92% compared with 33% in children presenting less than or at 24 months. Treatment based on type of deformity, age at time of injury, and growth remaining was considered successful in 83%. Patients with angular or linear deformities were more likely to present late, have high energy injuries, be male patients and have Salter-Harris types IV and V. Early diagnosis and treatment of growth disturbance can prevent severe deformity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10710263     DOI: 10.1177/107110070002100110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foot Ankle Int        ISSN: 1071-1007            Impact factor:   2.827


  5 in total

1.  Traumatic growth arrest of the distal tibia: a clinical and radiographic review.

Authors:  Karl-André Lalonde; Merv Letts
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.089

2.  Physeal injuries of the distal tibia: long-term results in 376 patients.

Authors:  Mark Schurz; Harald Binder; Patrick Platzer; Martin Schulz; Stefan Hajdu; Vilmos Vécsei
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  [Growth behavior after epiphyseal plate injury: importance of "watertight" osteosynthesis].

Authors:  L von Laer
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  Routine radiographic follow-up is not necessary after physeal fractures of the distal tibia in children.

Authors:  Antti Stenroos; Jussi Kosola; Jani Puhakka; Topi Laaksonen; Matti Ahonen; Yrjänä Nietosvaara
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 3.717

5.  A Retrospective Comparison of Above- vs Below-the-Knee Cast Treatment for Salter Harris-II Distal Tibia Fractures.

Authors:  Suhas P Dasari; Vasil V Kukushliev; Alexander R Graf; Xue-Cheng Liu; Scott E Van Valin
Journal:  Foot Ankle Orthop       Date:  2022-01-21
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.