Literature DB >> 10710200

Deprived areas and attendance to screening of cervix uteri cancer in a French region.

B Challier1, Y Meslans, J F Viel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine the relationship between deprivation and attendance to cervical cancer screening.
METHODS: Three deprivation indices (Carstairs, UnderPrivileged Area, Department of Environment) were calculated for women aged 25-65 attending a 1993-95 cervical cancer screening program (Doubs "département", France), with 594 municipalities as statistical units. Weighted multivariate linear regressions were performed, with attendance rate as the dependent variable, and the three deprivation indices in turn as independent variables along with women's mean age, average net income, density of (para)medical amenities, density of population and proportion of women.
RESULTS: Per municipality women were numbered 1-29,822 (mean 210). In multivariate models, the three deprivation indices were negatively linked to attendance rate, and so were mean age of women and density of population. Average net income, proportion of women, and density of (para)medical amenities (nurses, laboratories, ambulances, physicians, dentists) were positively associated with attendance rate.
CONCLUSIONS: In early stages, cervical cancer screening programs should account for populations living in deprived areas, through focused health promotion efforts and easier access to screening facilities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10710200     DOI: 10.1023/a:1008998322628

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Causes Control        ISSN: 0957-5243            Impact factor:   2.506


  8 in total

1.  Sociodemographic gradients in breast and cervical cancer screening in Korea: the Korean National Cancer Screening Survey (KNCSS) 2005-2009.

Authors:  Mi Jin Park; Eun-Cheol Park; Kui Son Choi; Jae Kwan Jun; Hoo-Yeon Lee
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 4.430

2.  Breast and cervical cancer screening in Great Britain: Dynamic interrelated processes.

Authors:  Alexander Labeit; Frank Peinemann
Journal:  Health Econ Rev       Date:  2015-10-20

3.  Breast and cervical cancer-screening uptake among females in Ardabil, northwest Iran: a community-based study.

Authors:  Esmaeil Farzaneh; Heshmatolah Heydari; Ali Akbar Shekarchi; Aziz Kamran
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Determinants of a GP visit and cervical cancer screening examination in Great Britain.

Authors:  Alexander Michael Labeit; Frank Peinemann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  General practitioners who never perform Pap smear: the medical offer and the socio-economic context around their office could limit their involvement in cervical cancer screening.

Authors:  Chiara Maj; Lorraine Poncet; Henri Panjo; Arnaud Gautier; Pierre Chauvin; Gwenn Menvielle; Emmanuelle Cadot; Virginie Ringa; Laurent Rigal
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 2.497

6.  Providing more balanced information on the harms and benefits of cervical cancer screening: A randomized survey among US and Norwegian women.

Authors:  P R Cyr; K Pedersen; A L Iyer; M K Bundorf; J D Goldhaber-Fiebert; D Gyrd-Hansen; I S Kristiansen; E A Burger
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2021-06-23

7.  Cervical cancer screening service utilisation in UK.

Authors:  Alexander Labeit; Frank Peinemann; Abbi Kedir
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Utilisation of preventative health check-ups in the UK: findings from individual-level repeated cross-sectional data from 1992 to 2008.

Authors:  Alexander Labeit; Frank Peinemann; Richard Baker
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 2.692

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.