Literature DB >> 10710164

A quantitative magnetic resonance imaging study of caudate and lenticular nucleus gray matter volume in primary unipolar major depression: relationship to treatment response and clinical severity.

S S Pillay1, P F Renshaw, C M Bonello, B C Lafer, M Fava, D Yurgelun-Todd.   

Abstract

The authors investigated whether there were differences in caudate and lenticular nucleus volumes in depressed patients relative to comparison subjects, and whether differences in basal ganglia volume were associated with treatment response to fluoxetine. Brain magnetic resonance images were obtained from 38 unipolar depressed patients and 20 matched comparison subjects. Patients were divided into groups of 'responders' and 'non-responders' based on change in the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) score after a 10-week open trial of fluoxetine, 20 mg/day. There were no group mean differences in caudate and lenticular nucleus volumes between patients and comparison subjects. Female treatment responders tended to have larger caudate nucleus volumes than male 'responders', and also larger right caudate nucleus volumes than their female 'non-responder' counterparts. Baseline HDRS scores correlated negatively with left caudate nucleus volume in depressed patients. Thus, in mild to moderately depressed patients, we were unable to find differences in caudate and lenticular nucleus-gray matter volumes relative to comparison subjects. One possible reason is that caudate nucleus-gray matter volume and severity of depression are inversely correlated, suggesting that severity of depression may be an important covariate when comparing caudate volumes in depressed patients and control subjects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 10710164     DOI: 10.1016/s0925-4927(98)00048-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychiatry Res        ISSN: 0165-1781            Impact factor:   3.222


  20 in total

1.  Gray matter differences between healthy and depressed adolescents: a voxel-based morphometry study.

Authors:  Mujeeb U Shad; Srirangam Muddasani; Uma Rao
Journal:  J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 2.576

2.  Three-dimensional surface mapping of the caudate nucleus in late-life depression.

Authors:  Meryl A Butters; Howard J Aizenstein; Kiralee M Hayashi; Carolyn C Meltzer; Jamie Seaman; Charles F Reynolds; Arthur W Toga; Paul M Thompson; James T Becker
Journal:  Am J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.105

Review 3.  Basal ganglia volumetric studies in affective disorder: what did we learn in the last 15 years?

Authors:  R M Bonelli; H-P Kapfhammer; S S Pillay; D A Yurgelun-Todd
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2005-10-27       Impact factor: 3.575

4.  Brain Volume Abnormalities in Youth at High Risk for Depression: Adolescent Brain and Cognitive Development Study.

Authors:  David Pagliaccio; Kira L Alqueza; Rachel Marsh; Randy P Auerbach
Journal:  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 8.829

5.  Reduced thalamic volumes in major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Allison Carol Nugent; Rebecca Marie Davis; Carlos Alberto Zarate; Wayne Curtis Drevets
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 3.222

6.  The functional neuroanatomy of geriatric depression.

Authors:  Gwenn S Smith; Elisse Kramer; Yilong Ma; Peter Kingsley; Vijay Dhawan; Thomas Chaly; David Eidelberg
Journal:  Int J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.485

7.  Brain volume abnormalities in major depressive disorder: a meta-analysis of magnetic resonance imaging studies.

Authors:  P Cédric M P Koolschijn; Neeltje E M van Haren; Gerty J L M Lensvelt-Mulders; Hilleke E Hulshoff Pol; René S Kahn
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Bipolar I disorder and major depressive disorder show similar brain activation during depression.

Authors:  Michael A Cerullo; James C Eliassen; Christopher T Smith; David E Fleck; Erik B Nelson; Jeffrey R Strawn; Martine Lamy; Melissa P DelBello; Caleb M Adler; Stephen M Strakowski
Journal:  Bipolar Disord       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 6.744

Review 9.  Bipolar and major depressive disorder: neuroimaging the developmental-degenerative divide.

Authors:  Jonathan Savitz; Wayne C Drevets
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 8.989

10.  Reduced caudate gray matter volume in women with major depressive disorder.

Authors:  M Justin Kim; J Paul Hamilton; Ian H Gotlib
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2008-10-19       Impact factor: 3.222

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.