Literature DB >> 10708176

Predictive value of a rapid semiquantitative D-dimer assay in critically ill patients with suspected venous thromboembolic disease.

M H Kollef1, M Zahid, P R Eisenberg.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of a new, rapid semi-quantitative assay for the detection of circulating D-dimer in whole blood from critically ill patients with suspected venous thromboembolic disease.
DESIGN: Prospective, blinded, single-center study.
SETTING: Medical intensive care unit (ICU) of Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, MO, a university-affiliated urban teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Two hundred thirty-nine adult patients with clinical suspicion of venous thromboembolic disease admitted to a medical ICU.
INTERVENTIONS: Collection of blood samples within 24 hrs of clinical suspicion of venous thromboembolic disease.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The main outcome measures evaluated included the occurrence of venous thromboembolic disease (i.e., lower extremity venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, catheter-associated venous thrombosis) and hospital mortality. Fifty-seven patients (23.8%) were classified as having venous thromboembolic disease during their ICU stays (pulmonary embolism, 21 patients; lower extremity thrombosis, 44 patients; line-associated venous thrombosis, 3 patients). The semiquantitative whole-blood assay for circulating D-dimer had a 96.4% sensitivity and a negative predictive value of 92.1% for identifying patients with venous thromboembolic disease. The specificity of this assay was 19.7%, and its positive predictive value was 26.9%. There was a strong correlation between the semiquantitative assay for circulating D-dimer and the quantitative measurement of circulating D-dimer using an enzyme immunoassay (Spearman's correlation coefficient, 0.8643; p<.001). We also identified a strong correlation between both the quantitative and semiquantitative measurements of circulating D-dimer with the sepsis classification proposed by the American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine (i.e., systemic inflammatory response syndrome, sepsis, severe sepsis, septic shock) for patients without venous thromboembolic disease (n = 182; quantitative measure: Spearman's correlation coefficient, 0.207; p = .002; semiquantitative measure: Spearman's correlation coefficient, 0.3519; p<.001).
CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary findings suggest that a rapid whole-blood assay for the semiquantitative detection of circulating D-dimer may be a useful diagnostic tool for the exclusion of venous thromboembolic disease among critically ill patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10708176     DOI: 10.1097/00003246-200002000-00021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  3 in total

1.  D-dimer for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: a call for sticking to evidence.

Authors:  Grégoire Le Gal; Henri Bounameaux
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-10-14       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Neither baseline tests of molecular hypercoagulability nor D-dimer levels predict deep venous thrombosis in critically ill medical-surgical patients.

Authors:  M A Crowther; D J Cook; L E Griffith; M Meade; S Hanna; C Rabbat; S M Bates; W Geerts; M Johnston; G Guyatt
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-12-09       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Comparison of multidetector computed tomography findings with clinical and laboratory data in pulmonary thromboembolism.

Authors:  Zuhal Gülşen; Pınar Nercis Koşar; Fatma Dilek Gökharman
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2015-05-13
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.