Literature DB >> 10707598

[How do patients evaluate their general practitioners? Danish results from a European study].

J Mainz1, P Vedsted, F Olesen.   

Abstract

This study aims to assess how patients evaluate the quality of general practice care. With a questionnaire answered by a sample of 1309 (90.9% response) from 36 practices. Patients answered 25 questions relating to their general practice care. Patients were, generally seen, very positive about their general practitioners. "Keeping your records and data confidential" and "providing quick services for urgent health problems" received most positive evaluations, while "waiting time in the waiting room", "being able to speak to the general practitioner on the telephone" and "getting through to the practice on the phone" were assessed most negatively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10707598

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ugeskr Laeger        ISSN: 0041-5782


  3 in total

1.  Data quality and confirmatory factor analysis of the Danish EUROPEP questionnaire on patient evaluation of general practice.

Authors:  Peter Vedsted; Ineta Sokolowski; Hanne N Heje
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.581

2.  The association between patient shortage and patient satisfaction with general practitioners.

Authors:  Hilde Lurås
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.581

3.  Patient characteristics associated with differences in patients' evaluation of their general practitioner.

Authors:  Hanne Nørgaard Heje; Peter Vedsted; Ineta Sokolowski; Frede Olesen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-08-20       Impact factor: 2.655

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.