Literature DB >> 10706743

Pulmonary mineral fibers after occupational and environmental exposure to asbestos in the Russian chrysotile industry.

A Tossavainen1, E Kovalevsky, E Vanhala, T Tuomi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: As an indicator of occupational, domestic, and environmental exposure, the level and type of asbestos fibers were determined from lung tissue samples of workers and residents who resided in the area of the world's largest asbestos mine at Asbest, Russia.
METHODS: Electron microscopy was used to analyze and measure the concentration of asbestos fibers in a series of 47 autopsies at the Asbest Town Hospital. Work histories were obtained from pathology reports and employment records.
RESULTS: In 24 chrysotile miners, millers, and product manufacturers, the pulmonary concentrations of retained fibers (over 1 microm in length) were 0. 8-50.6 million f/g for chrysotile, and < 0.1-1.9 million f/g for amphiboles (tremolite and anthophyllite). The concentrations were lower in 23 persons without any known occupational contact with asbestos; 0.1-14.6 million f/g for chrysotile, and < 0.1-0.7 million f/g for amphiboles. On average, 90% of all inorganic fibers were chrysotile, and 5% tremolite/anthophyllite. No amosite or crocidolite fibers were detected in any of the samples.
CONCLUSIONS: The mean and range of pulmonary chrysotile concentrations were about the same as reported previously from the Canadian mining and milling industry. In the Russian samples, the mean concentration of tremolite fibers were less by at least one order of magnitude. Occupational contact was the most important source of asbestos exposure. Copyright 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10706743     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0274(200004)37:4<327::aid-ajim1>3.0.co;2-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ind Med        ISSN: 0271-3586            Impact factor:   2.214


  5 in total

1.  Occupational exposure to asbestos and man-made vitreous fibres and risk of lung cancer: a multicentre case-control study in Europe.

Authors:  Rafael Carel; Ann C Olsson; David Zaridze; Neonila Szeszenia-Dabrowska; Peter Rudnai; Jolanta Lissowska; Eleonora Fabianova; Adrian Cassidy; Dana Mates; Vladimir Bencko; Lenka Foretova; Vladimir Janout; Joelle Fevotte; Tony Fletcher; Andrea 't Mannetje; Paul Brennan; Paolo Boffetta
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2006-10-19       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 2.  Health risk of chrysotile revisited.

Authors:  David Bernstein; Jacques Dunnigan; Thomas Hesterberg; Robert Brown; Juan Antonio Legaspi Velasco; Raúl Barrera; John Hoskins; Allen Gibbs
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 5.635

3.  Occupational cohort study of current and former workers exposed to chrysotile in mine and processing facilities in Asbest, the Russian Federation: Cohort profile of the Asbest Chrysotile Cohort study.

Authors:  Joachim Schüz; Igor Bukhtiyarov; Ann Olsson; Monika Moissonnier; Evgenia Ostroumova; Eleonora Feletto; Sara J Schonfeld; Graham Byrnes; Iraklii Tskhomariia; Valerie McCormack; Kurt Straif; Sergey Kashanskiy; Tatiana Morozova; Hans Kromhout; Evgeny Kovalevskiy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Temporal Trends in Airborne Dust Concentrations at a Large Chrysotile Mine and its Asbestos-enrichment Factories in the Russian Federation During 1951-2001.

Authors:  Sara J Schonfeld; Evgeny V Kovalevskiy; Eleonora Feletto; Igor V Bukhtiyarov; Sergey V Kashanskiy; Monika Moissonier; Kurt Straif; Valerie A McCormack; Joachim Schüz; Hans Kromhout
Journal:  Ann Work Expo Health       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 2.179

Review 5.  Occupational exposure to asbestos and cardiovascular related diseases: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yi Rong; Xin Luo; Zhihong Zhang; Xiuqing Cui; Yuewei Liu; Weihong Chen
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2015-10-21
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.