Literature DB >> 10705824

Appropriateness of prostate-specific antigen testing.

H T Poteat1, P Chen, K R Loughlin, J W Winkelman, R Allada, N Ma'luf, M J Tanasijevic, D W Bates.   

Abstract

We established criteria for appropriate use of the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) assay and used them to evaluate PSA test utilization at 1 tertiary care institution. During a 6-month period, 2,330 PSA results were reported for outpatients and 95 for inpatients. We reviewed medical records for a random sample of 338 outpatient results (14.51%) and all 95 inpatient results, of which 21% (71/338) of outpatient and 17% (16/95) of inpatient results were inappropriate according to our test utilization criteria. Among outpatients, 52% of tests were done for screening and 19% for monitoring for cancer recurrence. For inpatients, workup for cancer (53/95 [56%]) was the most frequent indication for testing and screening the second (24/95 [25%]). Of tests failing the criteria, 66 (76%) of 87 resulted from excessively frequent and age-inappropriate screening. We assessed the potential effect on clinical outcome if these tests were not performed. Of the 87 tests considered inappropriate, only 1 test result influenced clinical management for patients younger than 75 years. By instituting simple limits on age and frequency, we estimate that 74% (64/87) of the inappropriate tests could have been eliminated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10705824     DOI: 10.1309/E11X-491Y-GUJH-EGGF

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0002-9173            Impact factor:   2.493


  3 in total

1.  Brief report: Free prostate-specific antigen test utilization. Consistency with guidelines.

Authors:  Brian R Jackson; William L Roberts
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  David Westfall Bates, MD: a conversation with the editor on improving patient safety, quality of care, and outcomes by using information technology. Interview by William Clifford Roberts.

Authors:  David Westfall Bates
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2005-04

Review 3.  The landscape of inappropriate laboratory testing: a 15-year meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ming Zhi; Eric L Ding; Jesse Theisen-Toupal; Julia Whelan; Ramy Arnaout
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.