Literature DB >> 10705592

Tender point sensitivity, range of motion, and perceived disability in subjects with neck pain.

S L Olson1, D P O'Connor, G Birmingham, P Broman, L Herrera.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Descriptive analysis of impairment and disability measures in subjects with neck pain.
OBJECTIVES: To identify discrete tender points and overall pressure sensitivity and assess relationships among palpation tenderness, active cervical range of motion, visual analog scale pain scores, and Sickness Impact Profile disability scores.
BACKGROUND: Palpation tenderness and cervical range of motion are used to evaluate patients with neck pain, but their ability to predict patient-perceived pain and disability is unknown. METHODS AND MEASURES: We studied 45 women and 15 men with neck pain (mean age, 35 +/- 7 years). Group 1 included 30 persons who had not sought treatment, and group 2 included 30 persons who had just been referred for treatment.
RESULTS: Subjects demonstrated low mean pressure pain thresholds of tender points (2.3 +/- 1.3 kg). Regression analysis showed that only neck flexion predicted pain (R2 = 0.23), with decreased flexion associated with higher pain levels. Sickness Impact Profile total score was predicted by neck rotation (R2 = 0.31), group (R2 = 0.16), tender point pressure pain threshold (R2 = 0.04), and neck retraction (R2 = 0.03). Decreased neck rotation, neck retraction, and pressure pain thresholds were associated with higher disability.
CONCLUSIONS: Neither palpation tenderness nor cervical range of motion were strong predictors of pain and disability in subjects with neck pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10705592     DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2000.30.1.13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther        ISSN: 0190-6011            Impact factor:   4.751


  14 in total

1.  Mechanical pain sensitivity and the severity of chronic neck pain and disability are not modulated across the menstrual cycle.

Authors:  Jaclyn E Balter; Jennifer L Molner; Wendy M Kohrt; Katrina S Maluf
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2013-09-07       Impact factor: 5.820

Review 2.  Health related quality of life outcome instruments.

Authors:  Gunnar Németh
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Assessment of patients with neck pain: a review of definitions, selection criteria, and measurement tools.

Authors:  Victoria Misailidou; Paraskevi Malliou; Anastasia Beneka; Alexandros Karagiannidis; Georgios Godolias
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2010-06

4.  Disability and related factors in patients with chronic cervical myofascial pain.

Authors:  Burcu Duyur Cakit; Hakan Genç; Vedat Altuntaş; Hatice Rana Erdem
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 2.980

5.  Modifiable individual and work-related factors associated with neck pain in 740 office workers: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Xiaoqi Chen; Shaun O'Leary; Venerina Johnston
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  Incidence and risk factors of neck discomfort: a 6-month sedentary-worker cohort study.

Authors:  Jau-Yih Tsauo; Yuh Jang; Chung-Li Du; Huey-Wen Liang
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2007-03-06

7.  Cervical Spine Assessment Using Passive and Active Mobilization Recorded Through an Optical Motion Capture.

Authors:  Alejandro J Moreno; Gonzalo Utrilla; Javier Marin; Jose J Marin; Maria B Sanchez-Valverde; Ana C Royo
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2018-09-15

8.  Reliability of measuring the cervical sagittal translation mobility with a simple method in a clinical setting.

Authors:  Yvonne Severinsson; Lena Elisson; Olle Bunketorp
Journal:  Rehabil Res Pract       Date:  2012-11-04

Review 9.  Content validity of manual spinal palpatory exams - A systematic review.

Authors:  Wadie I Najm; Michael A Seffinger; Shiraz I Mishra; Vivian M Dickerson; Alan Adams; Sibylle Reinsch; Linda S Murphy; Arnold F Goodman
Journal:  BMC Complement Altern Med       Date:  2003-05-07       Impact factor: 3.659

10.  An investigation into the validity of cervical spine motion palpation using subjects with congenital block vertebrae as a 'gold standard'.

Authors:  Barry K Humphreys; Marianne Delahaye; Cynthia K Peterson
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2004-06-15       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.